Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 14;6(9):e1898.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001898. eCollection 2018 Sep.

The Outpatient DIEP: Safety and Viability following a Modified Recovery Protocol

Affiliations

The Outpatient DIEP: Safety and Viability following a Modified Recovery Protocol

Carlos A Martinez et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is considered the current state-of-the-art choice following mastectomies, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is often among the favored techniques. Commonly referred to patients as a combination between a tummy tuck and a breast augmentation, it significantly differs by the required expertise and long hospital stays. We present a series attesting to the feasibility and effectiveness of performing this type of reconstruction in an outpatient setting following our recovery protocol.

Methods: Patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction followed a recovery protocol that included intraoperative local anesthesia, microfascial incision technique for DIEP harvest, double venous system drainage technique, rib and chest muscle preservation, and prophylactic anticoagulation agents.

Results: Fourteen patients totaling 27 flaps underwent breast reconstruction following our protocol. All patients were discharged within the initial 23 hours, and no take-backs, partial, or total flap failures were recorded. A case of abdominal incision breakdown was seen in 1 patient during a postoperative visit, without evidence of frank infection. No further complications were observed in the 12-week average observation period.

Conclusion: With the proper use of a microfascial incision, complemented by rib sparing and appropriate use of injectable anesthetics, routine breast reconstructions with the DIEP flap can be safely performed in an outpatient setting with discharge in the 23-hour window.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Microfascial incisions are often kept around 2 cm if the number of perforators and the safety of the pedicle allows it. An incision of approximately 2.5 cm is shown.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The anastomosis of the flap pedicle to the IM vessels is performed without disruption of the rib (marked with an arrowhead), minimizing postoperative pain.

References

    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2016 Plastic surgery statistics report. Available at https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2016/plastic-su.... Accessed March 2018.
    1. Atherton DD, Hills AJ, Moradi P, et al. The economic viability of breast reconstruction in the UK: comparison of a single surgeon’s experience of implant; LD; TRAM and DIEP based reconstructions in 274 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:710. - PubMed
    1. Chang DW. Breast reconstruction with microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krishnan NM, Purnell C, Nahabedian MY, et al. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the muscle-sparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:948. - PubMed
    1. Matros E, Albornoz CR, Razdan SN, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:937. - PubMed