Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 12;2(4):790-799.
doi: 10.1002/rth2.12141. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Evaluation of a semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers

Affiliations

Evaluation of a semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers

Annette E Bowyer et al. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. .

Abstract

Background: The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non-standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi-automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available.

Objectives: This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in-house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD.

Results: Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in-house method.

Conclusions: 5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis.

Keywords: HMWM; Hydragel; VWD; VWF; densitometry; multimer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A‐D) Limit of detection of Hydragel 5 VW Multimers (H5VWM) using diluted normal plasma. H5VWM densitometry from left low molecular weight multimers (LMWM) to right high molecular weight multimers (HMWM) with peaks 1‐3 LMWM, 4‐7 intermediate molecular weight multimers (IMWM), and above 7 HMWM. Normal quality control sample is indicated by a solid black line and test samples in blue. The multimer image is depicted in the top right of each (A), von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF):Ag of 20 IU/dL densitometry LMWM 15.8%, IMWM 38%, HMWM 46.2%. (B) VWF:Ag of 15 IU/dL densitometry LMWM 19%, IMWM 35.8%, HMWM 45.2%. (C) VWF:Ag of 10 IU/dL densitometry LMWM 32%, IMWM 23.4%, HMWM 44.6%. (D) VWF:Ag of 5 IU/dL densitometry LMWM 30.8%, IMWM 23.4%, HMWM 45.8%
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rationalization of patient results according to the VWF activity, VWF Ac, ratio of VWF Ac/VWF:antigen (VWF:Ag) and in‐house multimer, IHVWM, result. Patients were group according to VWF Ac and then ratio of VWF activity and VWF:Ag. IHVWM pattern was assessed as normal or reduced high molecular weight multimers (HMWM) when less than 11 multimer triplets were visible. The number of patients with discrepancy between IHVWM and Hydragel 5 multimer method, H5VWM, is indicated. Results from patients with type 2N, type 3 and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) were excluded
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A‐E) Example Hydragel 5 VW multimers (H5VWM) densitometry of patients from the study. (A) Patient 10, normal VWF and 29% high molecular weight multimers (HMWM). (B) Patient 119 normal VWF, 22% HMWM and p.P1337L mutation linked to type 2B VWD. (C) Patient 70, compound heterozygous for p.F1501S and p.P1266E mutations but categorised as type 1 VWF with loss of IHVWM and normal H5VWM. (D) Patient 125 categorised as type 2M VWD but flattened HMWM peak and p.R1374C mutation. (E) an example of ultra‐large MWM in P165 with TTP and reduced ADAMTS13
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proposed VWD diagnostic algorithm incorporating H5VWM. *The more of these features the stronger the recommendation for H5VWM and vice versa. Follow orange line for VWF ≥50 IU/dL in absence of the mentioned features. AHA, acquired hemophilia A; FVIII, factor VIII activity; H5VWM, Hydragel 5 von Willebrand Multimer; MPS, myeloproliferative syndrome; PFA, platelet function analyzer; RIPA, Ristocetin‐Induced Platelet Aggregation; VWF, von Willebrand factor; VWD, von Willebrand disease; VWF ratio, ratio of VWF Act/VWF:Ag

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lillicrap D. The basic science, diagnosis and clinical management of von Willebrand disease. 2nd edn Montreal, QC: World Federation of Haemophilia; 2008.
    1. Bodo I, Eikenboom J, Montgomery RR, Patzke J, Schneppenheim R, Di Paola J. Platelet‐dependent von Willebrand factor activity. Nomenclature and methodology: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. JTH.. 2015;13:1345–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laffan MA, Lester W, O'Donnell JS, et al. The diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease: a United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organization guideline approved by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol. 2014;167:453–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadler JE, Budde U, Eikenboom JCJ, et al. Update on the pathophysiology and classification of von Willebrand disease: a report of the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2103–14. - PubMed
    1. Sadler JE. A revised classification of von Willebrand disease. Thromb Haemost. 1994;71:520–5. - PubMed