Use of the Xi robotic platform for total abdominal colectomy: a step forward in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
- PMID: 30350106
- PMCID: PMC6377813
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6529-x
Use of the Xi robotic platform for total abdominal colectomy: a step forward in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
Abstract
Background: The use of the da Vinci robotic platform for total colectomy has been limited by the need to reposition the patient-side surgical cart from one side of the patient to the other, which increases operative time. In this study, we examined the feasibility of robotic total colectomy using the da Vinci Xi model, which offers a rotating boom-mounted system and laser-targeted trocar positioning.
Methods: The study cohort consisted of 23 patients who underwent minimally invasive total colectomy for cancer or polyposis syndromes at a comprehensive cancer center between 2015 and 2017. Of the 23 colectomies, 15 were robotic and eight were laparoscopic. For the robotic colectomies, trocars were placed in the supraumbilical region and all four quadrants. The da Vinci Xi robot was placed between the patient's legs, and the boom was rotated from left to right and then to the middle in order to work sequentially on the right colon, the left colon, and the pelvis. Operating time and short-term outcomes were compared between the patients who underwent robotic surgery and the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery.
Results: The two groups of patients were comparable in age, gender, BMI, physical status, and disease types. In the robotic group, median length of stay (4 vs. 6 days, p = 0.047) was significantly shorter and median operative time (243 vs. 263 min, p = 0.97) and median estimated blood loss (50 vs. 100 ml; p = 0.08) were similar between the groups.
Conclusions: With the da Vinci Xi boom-mounted system, total abdominal colectomy can be performed without the need to move the patient-side surgical cart and is associated with shorter length of stay and similar operative time compared to the laparoscopic approach.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Robotic surgery; Total colectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Comment in
-
Total abdominal proctocolectomy: what is new with the da Vinci Xi?J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):711-712. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00970-x. Epub 2019 May 4. J Robot Surg. 2019. PMID: 31055772 No abstract available.
References
-
- D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Diseases of the colon and rectum 47:2162–2168 - PubMed
-
- Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, Paz B, Pigazzi A (2007) Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Annals of surgical oncology 14:3168–3173 - PubMed
-
- Zhang X, Wei Z, Bie M, Peng X, Chen C (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic- assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy 30:5601– 5614 - PubMed
-
- Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ, Mills S (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy. Surgical endoscopy 30:2792–2798 - PubMed
-
- Hanai T, Maeda K, Masumori K, Katsuno H, Matsuoka H (2015) Technique of Robotic-assisted Total Proctocolectomy with Lymphadenectomy and Ileal Pouch- Anal Anastomosis for Transverse Colitic Cancer of Ulcerative Colitis, Using the Single Cart Position. Surgical technology international 27:86–92 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical