Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):413.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2025-5.

Women's perception of support and control during childbirth in The Gambia, a quantitative study on dignified facility-based intrapartum care

Saffie Colley  1 , Chien-Huei Kao  2 , Meeiling Gau  3 , Su-Fen Cheng  4
Affiliations

Women's perception of support and control during childbirth in The Gambia, a quantitative study on dignified facility-based intrapartum care

Saffie Colley et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: In The Gambia, a woman faces 1 in 24-lifetime risk of maternal death due to pregnancy and childbirth, yet, only 57% of deliveries are conducted by skilled birth attendants. However, poor provider attitude has been identified as one of the contributing factors hampering the efforts of the government in improving access to skilled care during childbirth. This study, therefore, explored women's perception of support and control during childbirth in The Gambia.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was employed. A convenience sampling method was used to select participants in two regions in The Gambia. A sample size of 200 women who met the eligibility criteria was recruited after informed consent. The demographic-obstetric information sheet and the Support and Control in Birth scale (SCIB) were used to collect data. Data analysis was done using SPSS software version 23.0.

Results: Women's perceptions of support and control were low. External control 1.85 (SD ± 0.43) recorded the least perception compared to internal control 2.41 (SD ± 0.65) and perception of support 2.52 (SD ± 0.61). Participants reported the lowest perceptions in pain control, involvement in decision making, information sharing and the utilization of different position during birth. Women's age (p < .001) and mode of delivery (p = .01), significantly predicted women's perception of internal control. Educational status (p = .02), mode of delivery (p = .04), place of delivery (p < .001) and perception of support (p < .001) significantly predicted women's perception of external control, whilst birth plan (p = .001), mode of delivery (p = .04), and perception of external control (p < .001) significantly predicted women's perception of support.

Conclusion: This study concluded that an environment that promotes women feeling a sense of control and support during childbirth should be created in order to ensure a dignified intrapartum care in The Gambia. This can be achieved through effective training of skilled birth attendants on non-pharmacological pain management, effective communication with clients and promoting women's participation in decision-making regarding their care throughout the process of childbirth.

Keywords: Childbirth; Control; Perception; Support; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

A letter of approval to conduct this study was given by The Gambia government and Medical Research Council Joint Ethical Committee, reference number R016005.

Participants’ informed consent was sought during the recruitment process and during data collection, to ensure that participants’ rights were protected. As a result of the high illiteracy rate among participants, a verbal consent was given which was authenticated by their signatures in the form of thumb prints on the informed consent form. This was approved by The Gambia government and Medical Research Council Joint Ethical Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. WHO. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2015.
    1. WHO. Maternal mortality [https://apps.www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/index.html].
    1. Cham M, Sundby J, Vangen S. Maternal mortality in the rural Gambia, a qualitative study on access to emergency obstetric care. Reprod Health. 2005;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-2-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. WHO statement on the prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse durig facility-based childbirth [http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/134588/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng...].
    1. WHO: Respectful Maternity Care Charter [https://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Final_RMC...].

LinkOut - more resources