Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;33(8):2572-2582.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6552-y. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Affiliations

Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Roel Bolckmans et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity on literature data related to conversion of Omega anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

Methods: This is a retrospective study. Records of all patients who underwent this conversion were analyzed. Additionally, patients were contacted to answer a questionnaire on their current clinical condition.

Results: Twenty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic conversion between September 2007 and June 2016. Indications were peritonitis in 7 patients (leaks after OAGB in 5, perforated marginal ulcer (MU) and blow-out remnant with concomitant leak in one patient each), anastomotic bleeding in one, bile reflux in 6, recalcitrant MU in 4, afferent loop syndrome in 6, postprandial vomiting in 2 (related to anastomotic stenosis and perianastomotic diverticulum, one each), and malnutrition and hypoglycemia both in 1. Thirty-day mortality was zero, complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade III or more) 5% ((N = 1/20), abscess) when conversion was elective and 50.0% ((N = 4/8), all persisting leaks) when conversion was urgent. All 4 leaks persisting after conversion were successfully treated by endoscopic stenting, despite stent migration in 2 patients. Follow-up was available in 92.9%, for a mean time of 64.5 ± 30.1 months. Successful symptom relief (Likert score 4 or more) was noted for bile reflux and postprandial vomiting. Additionally, malnutrition was corrected.

Conclusions: When indicated, conversion of OAGB to RYGB is a safe treatment strategy. In case conversion is performed for leak after OAGB, persisting subclinical leaks are frequent but can be efficiently addressed by endoscopic stenting.

Keywords: Conversion; Endoscopic stenting; Omega anastomosis gastric bypass; Outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 May;206(5):935-8; discussion 938-9 - PubMed
    1. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jul;12(6):1206-12 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2001 Jun;11(3):276-80 - PubMed
    1. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Feb;12(2):305-12 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2015 Jun;25(6):951-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources