Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Dec;109(12):3953-3961.
doi: 10.1111/cas.13845. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Preliminary report of a single-channel applicator in high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for cervical cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Preliminary report of a single-channel applicator in high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for cervical cancer

Dan Li et al. Cancer Sci. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a patented single-channel applicator, which was modified from the traditional tandem applicator and wrapped with an oval-shield alloy around the source channel, has the same clinical efficacy and safety as the standard Fletcher-type applicator in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Between December 2011 and February 2017, 299 patients with pathologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage Ib2-IVa cervical cancer were recruited to the trial and finished the allocated intervention. Of the first 151 patients, 71 were allocated to the Fletcher group and 80 to the single-channel group, satisfying the criteria for a preliminary analysis. All but 3 patients were treated with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy followed by HDR brachytherapy. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional failure-free survival was 80.3%, 77.5%, and 78.9%, respectively, for the Fletcher group, and 86.3%, 82.5%, and 83.8%, respectively, for the single-channel group. The seriousness of acute treatment-related toxicities was similar in the 2 groups. The cumulative rate of late rectal complications of grade 3-4 in the Fletcher group and the single-channel group was 2.8% and 2.5%, respectively. The cumulative rate of grade 3 bladder complications was 2.8% for the Fletcher group and 1.3% for the single-channel group. The preliminary results of our study show that the patented single-channel intracavitary applicator might be able to provide protection for the rectum and bladder and seems to have the same clinical efficacy as the standard Fletcher-type 3-channel applicator in HDR brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR-TRC-12002321).

Keywords: cervical carcinoma; clinical trial; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; high dose rate brachytherapy; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sectional relative dose distributions of the single‐channel intracavitary applicator, tested using Mapcheck. A prescribed dose of 70 cGy was delivered to point A following optimized planning with a 6 cm effective length and a 1 cm step size. The ratio of the time between each spot was 13.9%, 11.0%, 6.8%, 8.3%, 15.5%, 22.5%, and 22.0%, respectively. A, Diagram showing the lead thicknesses in the anteroposterior and lateral directions. B, Dose distributions in cross‐sectional view. C, Dose distributions in coronal view. D, Dose distributions in sagittal view
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of the intracavitary applicators. A, Fletcher applicator sets (left) and single‐channel applicator (right) that comprises an internally lead‐shielded region, surrounded with an outer tube for placement and special canular structure to reduce artifacts (middle). B, Inner tube with lead‐shielding from a vertical view. The front and back direction of the lead should be consistent with the direction of the urinary bladder and the rectum
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow diagram of trial participants with carcinoma of the cervix treated with Fletcher or single‐channel applicators of high dose rate brachytherapy
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan‐Meier estimates of survival curves of patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with Fletcher or single‐channel applicators of high dose rate brachytherapy. A, Overall survival. B, Progression‐free survival. C, Locoregional failure‐free survival. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sankaranarayanan R. Overview of cervical cancer in the developing world. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl 1):S205‐S210. - PubMed
    1. Gaffney DK, Erickson‐Wittmann BA, Jhingran A, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) on advanced cervical cancer expert panel on radiation oncology‐gynecology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(3):609‐614. - PubMed
    1. Smith GL, Jiang J, Giordano SH, Meyer LA, Eifel PJ. Trends in the quality of treatment for patients with intact cervical cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92(2):260‐267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Feghali KA, Elshaikh MA. Why brachytherapy boost is the treatment of choice for most women with locally advanced cervical carcinoma? Brachytherapy. 2016;15(2):191‐199. - PubMed
    1. Viswanathan AN, Moughan J, Small W Jr, et al. The quality of cervical cancer brachytherapy implantation and the impact on local recurrence and disease‐free survival in radiation therapy oncology group prospective trials 0116 and 0128. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(1):123‐131. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types