Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort
- PMID: 30353911
- PMCID: PMC6941787
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31940
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort
Abstract
Little is known about the effect of evolving risk-based cervical cancer screening and management guidelines on United States (US) clinical practice and patient outcomes. We describe the National Cancer Institute's Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR I) consortium, methods and baseline findings from its cervical sites: Kaiser Permanente Washington, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Parkland Health & Hospital System/University of Texas Southwestern (Parkland-UTSW) and New Mexico HPV Pap Registry housed by University of New Mexico (UNM-NMHPVPR). Across these diverse healthcare settings, we collected data on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations, screening tests/results, diagnostic and treatment procedures/results and cancer diagnoses on nearly 4.7 million women aged 18-89 years from 2010 to 2014. We calculated baseline (2012 for UNM-NMHPVPR; 2010 for other sites) frequencies for sociodemographics, cervical cancer risk factors and key screening process measures for each site's cohort. Healthcare delivery settings, cervical cancer screening strategy, race/ethnicity and insurance status varied among sites. The proportion of women receiving a Pap test during the baseline year was similar across sites (26.1-36.1%). Most high-risk HPV tests were performed either reflexively or as cotests, and utilization pattern varied by site. Prevalence of colposcopy or biopsy was higher at Parkland-UTSW (3.6%) than other sites (1.3-1.4%). Incident cervical cancer was rare. HPV vaccination among age-eligible women not already immunized was modest across sites (0.1-7.2%). Cervical PROSPR I makes available high-quality, multilevel, longitudinal screening process data from a large and diverse cohort of women to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of US cervical cancer screening delivery.
Keywords: Pap test; cancer screening; cervical cancer; human papillomavirus.
© 2018 UICC.
Similar articles
-
Persistent Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: Knowledge and Sociodemographic Determinants of Papanicolaou and Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women in the United States.Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(4):483-491. doi: 10.1177/0033354920925094. Epub 2020 Jun 9. Public Health Rep. 2020. PMID: 32516053 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical cancer screening and subsequent procedures in women under the age of 25 years between 2007 and 2013 in France: a nationwide French healthcare database study.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Sep;27(5):479-485. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000360. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018. PMID: 28368950
-
Catch-up HPV Vaccination and Subsequent Uptake of Papanicolaou Testing in A State-mandated Health System.Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Apr;14(4):415-420. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0570. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021. PMID: 33687944
-
A roadmap for a comprehensive control of cervical cancer in Poland: integration of available solutions into current practice in primary and secondary prevention.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Mar;29(2):157-164. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000528. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020. PMID: 31517672 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cervical Cancer Screening.Med Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;101(4):743-753. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Med Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28577624 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Anal Cancer and Anal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Risk Among Women Living With HIV.J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021 Jan 1;25(1):43-47. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000578. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021. PMID: 33149011 Free PMC article.
-
Age-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus and abnormal cytology at baseline in a diverse statewide prospective cohort of individuals undergoing cervical cancer screening in Mississippi.Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8641-8650. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4340. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Cancer Med. 2021. PMID: 34734483 Free PMC article.
-
Positive predictive value of cervical cancer screening results recommended for colposcopy by human papillomavirus vaccination status at 3 U.S. healthcare systems.Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02039-7. Online ahead of print. Cancer Causes Control. 2025. PMID: 40768171
-
Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics.Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106871. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106871. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 34762966 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):238-246. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz137. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020. PMID: 31292633 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beaber EF, Kim JJ, Schapira MM, Tosteson AN, Zauber AG, Geiger AM, Kamineni A, Weaver DL, Tiro JA, Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens Consortium. Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107(6):djv120. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Landis S, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo P. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49(1):8–31, 31. - PubMed
-
- Wingo PA, Cardinez CJ, Landis SH, Greenlee RT, Ries LA, Anderson RN, Thun MJ. Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930–1998. Cancer 2003;97(12 Suppl):3133–3275. - PubMed
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Cervix cancer screening. Vol 10 Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2005.
-
- Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(5):1222–1238. - PubMed