Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Mar 15;144(6):1460-1473.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.31940. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort

Aruna Kamineni et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Little is known about the effect of evolving risk-based cervical cancer screening and management guidelines on United States (US) clinical practice and patient outcomes. We describe the National Cancer Institute's Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR I) consortium, methods and baseline findings from its cervical sites: Kaiser Permanente Washington, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Parkland Health & Hospital System/University of Texas Southwestern (Parkland-UTSW) and New Mexico HPV Pap Registry housed by University of New Mexico (UNM-NMHPVPR). Across these diverse healthcare settings, we collected data on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations, screening tests/results, diagnostic and treatment procedures/results and cancer diagnoses on nearly 4.7 million women aged 18-89 years from 2010 to 2014. We calculated baseline (2012 for UNM-NMHPVPR; 2010 for other sites) frequencies for sociodemographics, cervical cancer risk factors and key screening process measures for each site's cohort. Healthcare delivery settings, cervical cancer screening strategy, race/ethnicity and insurance status varied among sites. The proportion of women receiving a Pap test during the baseline year was similar across sites (26.1-36.1%). Most high-risk HPV tests were performed either reflexively or as cotests, and utilization pattern varied by site. Prevalence of colposcopy or biopsy was higher at Parkland-UTSW (3.6%) than other sites (1.3-1.4%). Incident cervical cancer was rare. HPV vaccination among age-eligible women not already immunized was modest across sites (0.1-7.2%). Cervical PROSPR I makes available high-quality, multilevel, longitudinal screening process data from a large and diverse cohort of women to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of US cervical cancer screening delivery.

Keywords: Pap test; cancer screening; cervical cancer; human papillomavirus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beaber EF, Kim JJ, Schapira MM, Tosteson AN, Zauber AG, Geiger AM, Kamineni A, Weaver DL, Tiro JA, Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens Consortium. Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107(6):djv120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landis S, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo P. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49(1):8–31, 31. - PubMed
    1. Wingo PA, Cardinez CJ, Landis SH, Greenlee RT, Ries LA, Anderson RN, Thun MJ. Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930–1998. Cancer 2003;97(12 Suppl):3133–3275. - PubMed
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Cervix cancer screening. Vol 10 Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2005.
    1. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(5):1222–1238. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances