Association Between 30-Day Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Education and Certification Variables for New York State Interventional Cardiologists
- PMID: 30354589
- PMCID: PMC6440467
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006094
Association Between 30-Day Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Education and Certification Variables for New York State Interventional Cardiologists
Abstract
Background: Patients and other providers have access to few publicly available physician attributes that identify interventional cardiologists with better postprocedural outcomes, particularly in states without public reporting of outcomes. Interventional cardiology board certification, maintenance of certification, graduation from a US medical school, medical school ranking, and length of practice represent such publicly available attributes. Previous studies on these measures have shown mixed results.
Methods and results: We included interventional cardiologists practicing in New York State in the years 2011 to 2013. The primary outcome was 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Hierarchical regression modeling was used to analyze the physician attributes and was adjusted for provider caseload. A total of 356 providers were studied. The average 30-day RSMR was 1.1 (SD=0.1) deaths per 100 cases for all percutaneous coronary interventions and 0.7 (SD=0.1) deaths per 100 cases for nonemergent procedures. The primary outcome was slightly lower among providers with interventional cardiology board certification compared with noncertified providers (1.06 [SD=0.14] versus 1.14 [SD=0.14] deaths per 100 cases; P<0.001). In multivariable hierarchical regression modeling, after adjusting for provider caseload, none of the physician attributes were associated with the primary outcome. Provider caseload was significantly associated with 30-day RSMR independent of the other attributes.
Conclusions: Interventional cardiology board-certified providers had a modestly lower 30-day RSMR before accounting for caseload. However, after adjusting for provider caseload, none of the examined publicly available physician attributes, including interventional cardiology board certification, were independently associated with 30-day RSMR.
Keywords: certification; education, medical; outcome assessment (health care); percutaneous coronary intervention; quality of health care.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures
Dr Kolansky has served as a member of the American Board of Internal Medicine Interventional Cardiology test writing committee. The other authors report no conflicts.
Figures
Comment in
-
Inadequate Surrogates for Imperfect Quality Measures.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e007216. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007216. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30354606 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Mukamel DB, Mushlin AI. Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State cardiac surgery mortality reports. Med Care. 1998;36:945–954. - PubMed
-
- Sharp LK, Bashook PG, Lipsky MS, Horowitz SD, Miller SH. Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: the missing link. Acad Med. 2002;77:534–542. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
