Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 24;14(1):319.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1645-3.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tylosin against Streptococcus suis in pigs

Affiliations

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tylosin against Streptococcus suis in pigs

Lingli Huang et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to optimize the dosage regimen of tylosin against S.suis in Pigs using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. The antibacterial activity of tylosin against S.suis CVCC606 was investigated in Mueller Hinton (MH) broth and serum. The objectives of this investigation were to study the PD data of tylosin against S.suis CVCC606 and the PK data of tylosin in healthy and diseased model of pigs and formulate a rational dosage regimen for the treatment of pig streptococcosis.

Results: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were 0.25 μg/mL, and the minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were 1 μg/mL in MH broth and serum. The killing curve showed time-dependent activity and weak concentration-dependent antibacterial activity. A pig pneumoniae model of S. suis infection was built by inoculating subcutaneously with S. suis CVCC606. Tylosin was (10 mg/kg b.w) administered intramuscularly (IM) to the healthy and S.suis infected pigs, The pharmacokinetic properties, including area under the curve(AUC), peak concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax (Tmax), were determined in plasma using UV-HPLC method. The AUC, Cmax and Tmax in plasma of healthy and infected pigs were 10.80 ± 2.20 and 10.30 ± 3.46 μg.h/mL, 2.06 ± 0.43 and 2.37 ± 0.38 μg/mL, 1.95 ± 0.22 and 1.58 ± 0.49 h, respectively.

Conclusions: The in vivo PK and in vitro PD data were integrated to determine the surrogate marker of antibacterial activity, Cmax/MIC, AUC/MIC and T>MICwere 8.90, 43.21, 8.86 for healthy pigs, and 9.76, 41.18, 7.56 for infected pigs, respectively. Ex vivo AUC/MIC data were integrated with ex vivo bacterial count to calculate the values for bacteriostatic and bactericidal action, which were 10.67 h and 49.66 h for healthy pigs, 11.73 h and 43.03 h for pigs infected with S.suis. A dosage regimen of 5.32-19.50 mg/kg b.w. every 24 h should be sufficient for tylosin against S.suis.

Keywords: Dosage regimen; PK/PD modeling; Pig; Streptococcus suis; Tylosin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University and the Animal Care Center, Hubei Science and Technology Agency.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Killing curve of tylosin against S. suis in broth (a) and serum (b) measured at pre-determined time. The x-axis was the 0–24 h incubation time point; y-axis was the count numbers exposed to a series of concentrations of tylosin
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The ex vivo antibacterial curve of tylosin against CVCC606 in serum from healthy pigs (a) and diseased pigs (b). The ex vivo antibacterial activity in serum was determined in samples harvested at pre-determined times (0.17, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 h after tylosin IM dosing)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Semi-logarithmic plot of serum concentrations of tylosin after IM administration at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg b.w. (n = 8)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sigmoid Emax relationship for bacterial count vs. ex vivo AUC/MIC in serum from healthy pigs(a) and diseased pigs(b)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rajahram GS, Hameed AA, Menon J, William T, Tambyah PA, Yeo TW. Case report: two human Streptococcus suis infections in Borneo, Sabah, Malaysia. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(188):1–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seitz M, Valentin-Weigand P, Willenborg J. Use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine as exemplified by the swine pathogen Streptococcus suis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2016;398:103–121. - PubMed
    1. Huong VTL, Ha N, Huyb NT, Horby P, Nghia HDT, Thiem VD, et al. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of Streptococcus suis infection in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(7):1105–1114. doi: 10.3201/eid2007.131594. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Athey TBT, Teatero S, Takamatsu D, Wasserscheid J, Dewar K, Gottschalk M, et al. Population structure and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Streptococcus suis serotype 2 sequence type 25 strains. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150908. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costa ATR, Lobato FCF, Abreu VLV, Assis RA, Reis R, Uzal FA. Serotyping and evaluation of the virulence in mice of Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased pigs. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2005;47(2):113–115. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652005000200012. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms