Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 23;20(10):e11006.
doi: 10.2196/11006.

Oncology Patient Interest in the Use of New Technologies to Manage Their Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey

Affiliations

Oncology Patient Interest in the Use of New Technologies to Manage Their Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey

Roberto Collado-Borrell et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) in oncology can revolutionize the medical care of cancer patients. ICTs can promote patients' empowerment and real-time disease monitoring. There is limited information about the impact of ICTs in cancer patients or their level of interest in using these tools for greater management of their condition.

Objective: This study aimed to understand the ICT usage profile in hematology-oncology patients to identify their needs and determine their level of interest in these technologies as a means of managing their disease.

Methods: A 28-item questionnaire was drawn up by a multidisciplinary team including pharmacists and oncologists. The questions were organized into 3 blocks, which were as follows: block A-sociodemographic characteristics; block B-use of ICTs when searching for health-related information; and block C-usage preferences for health apps. Hematology-oncology patients receiving treatment between May and July 2017 were included. A paper copy of the questionnaire was handed over to patients in either the day hospital or the pharmaceutical care consultancy in pharmacy services.

Results: A total of 650 questionnaires were handed out, with a participation of 94.0% (611/650). Patient sociodemographic characteristics were as follows: mean age was 57.8 years (age range: 19-91). Of 611 participants, 40.7% (249/611) had a university education, and 45.1% (276/611) of participants reported their overall state of health to be good. Results from use of ICTs when searching for health-related information were as follows: 87.1% (532/611) of participants were interested in being informed about health-related matters. Of all participants, 75.5% (532/611) sought information from health professionals and 61.3% (375/611) on the internet. Before going to their doctor's appointment, 21.8% (133/611) of patients looked up information about their disease or treatment on the internet. This access to the internet rose to 50.9% (311/611) after their first medical appointment with their oncologist. Usage preferences for health apps were as follows: 82.7% (505/611) had a smartphone, whereas 20.3% (124/611) had a health app installed. Overall, 81.5% (498/611) would use an app if their health professional recommended it to them, but 39.6% (242/611) were not willing to pay for it.

Conclusions: The hematology-oncology patients showed a great deal of interest in searching for health-related information by means of ICTs, especially using smartphones and apps. The issues that drew the most interest in terms of apps were appointment management, advice on disease management, and communication with health professionals. Free access to these features and the recommendation by a health professional are important factors when it comes to their use. Therefore, the health care provider is a key element in the recommendation of ICTs, providing their knowledge and experience concerning their correct usage.

Keywords: app; eHealth; information and communication technologies; oncology patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency with which patients used different information and communication technologies to search for information on the internet.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reasons why patients used a health app, and things they wish the app could help them with.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. García Cuyás F, de San Pedro M, Ledesma Castelltor A. Las TICs y la gestión de pacientes crónicos. Sociedad Española Informática Salud. 2014;105:11–13. http://www.ticsalut.cat/media/upload/pdf/article-tics-i-cronics-fgc_edit...
    1. Cepeda Díez JM, Meijome Sánchez XM, Santillán García A. Innovaciones en salud y tecnologías: las cosas claras. Rev enferm CyL. 2012;4(1):28–32. http://www.revistaenfermeriacyl.com/index.php/revistaenfermeriacyl/artic...
    1. Collado-Borrell R, Escudero-Vilaplana V, Ribed-Sánchez A, Ibáñez-García S, Herranz-Alonso A, Sanjurjo-Sáez M. Smartphone applications for cancer patients; what we know about them? Farm Hosp. 2016 Jan 01;40(1):25–35. doi: 10.7399/fh.2016.40.1.8993. http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/8993.pdf - DOI - PubMed
    1. Los ciudadanos ante la e-Sanidad. Ontsi.red. Opiniones y expectativas de los ciudadanos sobre el uso y aplicación de las TIC en el ámbito sanitario http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/sites/ontsi/files/los_ciudadanos_ante_la_e... .
    1. Sawesi S, Rashrash M, Phalakornkule K, Carpenter JS, Jones JF. The impact of information technology on patient engagement and health behavior change: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4514. http://medinform.jmir.org/2016/1/e1/ v4i1e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources