Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 24;19(11):3308.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19113308.

Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Affiliations
Review

Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Patrick Rider et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an important tool in the field of tissue engineering and its further development will lead to completely new clinical possibilities. The ability to create tissue scaffolds with controllable characteristics, such as internal architecture, porosity, and interconnectivity make it highly desirable in comparison to conventional techniques, which lack a defined structure and repeatability between scaffolds. Furthermore, 3D printing allows for the production of scaffolds with patient-specific dimensions using computer-aided design. The availability of commercially available 3D printed permanent implants is on the rise; however, there are yet to be any commercially available biodegradable/bioresorbable devices. This review will compare the main 3D printing techniques of: stereolithography; selective laser sintering; powder bed inkjet printing and extrusion printing; for the fabrication of biodegradable/bioresorbable bone tissue scaffolds; and, discuss their potential for dental applications, specifically augmentation of the alveolar ridge.

Keywords: 3D printing; additive manufacturing; bone augmentation; bone regeneration; bone scaffold; dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Xenogeneic bone graft (Cerabone®) showing seamless tissue integration. Arrows are used to highlight the bone graft/host bone tissue interface.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alveolar ridge augmentation using an additively manufactured bone tissue scaffold. (1) a bone defect has formed in the alveolar ridge; (2) a bone scaffold is designed and then printed using additive manufacturing technology; (3) the printed bone scaffold is placed in the defect space to support bone regeneration; (4) new bone infiltrates the scaffold, eventually degrading or resorbing the structure; and, (5) a dental implant in positioned in the regenerated bone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic of stereolithography (SLA) printing process. The laser source cures the top of the liquid resin in a predetermined pattern. The platform is then lowered by the height of the cured resin and the process is repeated.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic of selective laser sintering (SLS) process. A laser source sinters/melts the top layer of powder in a powder bed in a predetermined pattern. The powder bed is lowered in height and a fresh layer of powder is positioned on top via a leveling roller. The process is then repeated.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic of Two Different Inkjet Printing Mechanisms over a powder bed: 1. Thermal-based, 2. Piezoelectric-based. The inkjet printheads dispense a binding solution to the powder bed below. The powder bed is lowered in height and a fresh layer of powder is positioned on top via a leveling roller. The process is then repeated.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of two different xenogeneic bone graft materials: (A) sintered xenograft (Cerabone®) and (B) non-sintered xenograft (BioOss®). For example, xenograft (A) has a rougher surface in comparison to xenograft (B).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic of extrusion based printing. A liquid resin is extruded in the form of a filament into a predetermined pattern.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang W., Duan J., Wang Q., Kuang W. Complex reconstruction of facial deformity and function after severe gunshot injury: One case report. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015;8:1427–1433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park Y.-H., Choi S.-H., Cho K.-S., Lee J.-S. Dimensional alterations following vertical ridge augmentation using collagen membrane and three types of bone grafting materials: A retrospective observational study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2017;19:742–749. doi: 10.1111/cid.12502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oryan A., Alidadi S., Moshiri A., Maffulli N. Bone regenerative medicine: Classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2014;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roseti L., Parisi V., Petretta M., Cavallo C., Desando G., Bartolotti I., Grigolo B. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017;78:1246–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polo-Corrales L., Latorre-Esteves M., Ramirez-Vick J.E. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014;14:15–56. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2014.9127. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources