Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 24;8(1):15681.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33351-9.

The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen

Affiliations

The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen

Hee-Beom Yang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

There are few reports on enterostomy closure (EC) timing for acute abdomen in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients. We retrospectively reviewed ELBW patients who underwent enterostomy formation (EF) and subsequent EC. We investigated baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data of 55 patients and analyzed optimal timing by age at EC, enterostomy duration, and body weight (Bwt) at EC. The minimum p-value approach (MPA) using the Chi-squared test was used to determine each cut-off value. Mean gestational age was 25+3 weeks, while mean age and Bwt at EF were 10 days and 660 g. Enterostomy duration and Bwt at EC were 102 days and 2400 g. Fourteen surgical complications were related to EC. The MPA identified a cut-off of 2100 g (p = 0.039) at EC but no significant cut-off age or enterostomy duration. The 18 patients <2100 g had more enterostomy-related problems at EC than the >2100 g group (66.7% vs 10.8%, p < 0.001). No other characteristics were significantly different. Operation time, ventilator period, hospital stay, parenteral nutrition duration, and full feeding day were significantly longer in <2100 g patients. Follow-up Bwt did not differ (11.55 kg vs 13.95 kg, p = 0.324). Our findings suggest EC can be safely performed when Bwt is over 2100 g.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants in Korea (total ELBW newborns/total newborns yearly), 2007–2016, raw data from Statistics Korea.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of patient inclusion process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of minimum p-value analysis with respect to age, corrected age, body weight at enterostomy closure (EC), and enterostomy duration for EC-related complication. Only body weight at EC showed significant cut-off values. Among them, 2100 g yielded the minimum p-value in the Chi-squared test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moon JY, Hahn WH, Shim KS, Chang JY, Bae CW. Changes of Maternal Age Distribution in Live Births and Incidence of Low Birth Weight Infants in Advanced Maternal Age Group in Korea. Korean J Perinatol. 2011;22:30–36.
    1. Singh M, Owen A, Gull S, Morabito A, Bianchi A. Surgery for intestinal perforation in preterm neonates: anastomosis vs stoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:725–729. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sola JE, Tepas JJ, 3rd, Koniaris LG. Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal perforation: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2010;161:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moss RL, et al. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2225–2234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054605. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms