Too Worried to Judge: On the Role of Perceived Severity in Medical Decision-Making
- PMID: 30356743
- PMCID: PMC6189396
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01906
Too Worried to Judge: On the Role of Perceived Severity in Medical Decision-Making
Abstract
Ideally, decisions regarding one's health should be made after assessing the objective probabilities of relevant outcomes. Nevertheless, previous beliefs and emotional reactions also have a role in decision-making. Furthermore, the comprehension of probabilities is commonly affected by the presentation format, and by numeracy. This study aimed to assess the extent to which the influence of these factors might vary between different medical conditions. A sample of university students were presented with two health scenarios containing statistical information on the prevalence of breast cancer and hypertension either through icon arrays (N = 71) or natural frequencies (N = 72). They also received information regarding a preventive measure (mammogram/low-sodium diet) and the likelihood of a positive mammogram or a rich-sodium diet either when suffering or not suffering from the disease. Before seeing the data, participants rated the severity of the disease and the inconvenience of the preventive measure. After reading the health scenario, participants had to rate its difficulty, and how worrisome it was. They had also to rate the prior probability of suffering from this medical condition, and the posterior probability of it, provided a positive mammogram or a rich-sodium diet. Finally, they rated the extent to which they would recommend the preventive measures. All the rates used the same 1 (little)-8 (a great deal) scale. Participants' numeracy was also assessed. The scenarios differed significantly in perceived severity and worry, with the cancer scenario obtaining higher scores. Importantly, regression analyses showed that the recommendations in the two health scenarios depended on different variables. A model taking into consideration severity and worry rates best explained decisions in the cancer scenario; in contrast, in the hypertension scenario the model that best explained the recommendations comprised both the posterior probability estimate and the severity rate. Neither numeracy nor presentation format affected recommendation but both affected difficulty, worrying and probability rates. We conclude that previous perceptions of the severity of a health condition modulate the use of probabilistic information for decision-making. The roles of presentation format and numeracy in enabling patients to understand statistical information are also discussed.
Keywords: affect; medical decision; numeracy; numerical format; probability judgment; severity perception.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255337. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255337. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2025. PMID: 39995775 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cancer Patients Numeracy and Preferences for Information Presentation-a Survey Among German Cancer Patients.J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):22-27. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1435-4. J Cancer Educ. 2020. PMID: 30338481
-
Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.Med Decis Making. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):432-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10391672. Epub 2010 Dec 29. Med Decis Making. 2011. PMID: 21191122 Clinical Trial.
-
Worry about lung cancer is related to numeracy and risk perception of diseases associated with smoking.Am J Health Educ. 2020;51(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2019.1687364. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Am J Health Educ. 2020. PMID: 33042323 Free PMC article.
-
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73. doi: 10.1037/a0017327. Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19883143 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2025. PMID: 39995784 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255337. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255337. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2025. PMID: 39995775 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Different Visualizations Cause Different Strategies When Dealing With Bayesian Situations.Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 21;11:1897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01897. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32973606 Free PMC article.
-
Patient opinions on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A patient-driven discussion in need of tuning?Can J Surg. 2022 Apr 1;65(2):E250-E256. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003420. Print 2022 Mar-Apr. Can J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35365498 Free PMC article.
-
Using a Foreign Language Changes Medical Judgments of Preventative Care.Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):1309. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101309. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34679374 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brase G. L. (2009). Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 23 369–381. - PubMed
-
- Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112 155–159. - PubMed
-
- Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., Buchner A. (2007). G∗Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39 175–191. - PubMed
-
- Finucane M. L., Alhakami A., Slovic P., Johnson S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 13 1–17.
-
- Garcia-Retamero R., Hoffrage U. (2013). Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients. Soc. Sci. Med. 83 27–33. - PubMed