Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 9:9:1926.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01926. eCollection 2018.

Going Beyond the Data as the Patching (Sheaving) of Local Knowledge

Affiliations
Review

Going Beyond the Data as the Patching (Sheaving) of Local Knowledge

Steven Phillips. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Consistently predicting outcomes in novel situations is colloquially called "going beyond the data," or "generalization." Going beyond the data features in spatial and non-spatial cognition, raising the question of whether such features have a common basis-a kind of systematicity of generalization. Here, we conceptualize this ability as the patching of local knowledge to obtain non-local (global) information. Tracking the passage from local to global properties is the purview of sheaf theory, a branch of mathematics at the nexus of algebra and geometry/topology. Two cognitive domains are examined: (1) learning cue-target patterns that conform to an underlying algebraic rule, and (2) visual attention requiring the integration of space-based feature maps. In both cases, going beyond the data is obtained from a (universal) sheaf theory construction called "sheaving," i.e., the "patching" of local data attached to a topological space to obtain a representation considered as a globally coherent cognitive map. These results are discussed in the context of a previous (category theory) explanation for systematicity, vis-a-vis, categorical universal constructions, along with other cognitive domains where going beyond the data is apparent. Analogous to higher-order function (i.e., a function that takes/returns a function), going beyond the data as a higher-order systematicity property is explained by sheaving, a higher-order (categorical) universal construction.

Keywords: category theory; generalization; learning; sheaf; sheaf theory; sheaving; universal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of sheaving as a product.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of sheaving as a constrained product (empty box indicates empty set).
Figure 3
Figure 3
An example of generalization as sheaving.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abecassis M., Sera M. D., Yonas A., Schwade J. (2001). What's in a shape: children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 78, 303–326. 10.1006/jecp.2000.2573 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abramsky S., Brandenburger A. (2011). The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality. New J. Phys. 13:113036 10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036 - DOI
    1. Aizawa K. (2003). The Systematicity Arguments. Studies in Mind and Brain. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
    1. Andrews G., Halford G. S. (1998). Children's ability to make transitive inferences: the importance of premise integration and structural complexity. Cogn. Dev. 13, 479–513. 10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90004-1 - DOI
    1. Andrews G., Halford G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cogn. Psychol. 45, 153–219. 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00002-6 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources