Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 9:9:492.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00492. eCollection 2018.

Verbal Deception and the Model Statement as a Lie Detection Tool

Affiliations
Review

Verbal Deception and the Model Statement as a Lie Detection Tool

Aldert Vrij et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

We have been reliably informed by practitioners that police officers and intelligence officers across the world have started to use the Model Statement lie detection technique. In this article we introduce this technique. We describe why it works, report the empirical evidence that it works, and outline how to use it. Research examining the Model Statement only started recently and more research is required. We give suggestions for future research with the technique. The Model Statement technique is one of many recently developed verbal lie detection methods. We start this article with a short overview of the-in our view- most promising recent developments in verbal lie detection before turning our attention to the Model Statement technique.

Keywords: deception; encouraging interviewees to say more; interview; lie detection; model statement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DePaulo BM, Lindsay JL, Malone BE, Muhlenbruck L, Charlton K, Cooper H. Cues to deception. Psychol Bull. (2003) 129:74–118. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DePaulo BM, Morris WL. Discerning lies from truths: behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. In: Granhag PA, Strömwall LA. editors. Deception Detection in Forensic Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; (2004). p. 15–40.
    1. Bond CF, DePaulo BM. Accuracy of deception judgements. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. (2006) 10:214–34. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartwig M, Granhag PA, Strömwall L, Doering N. Impression and information management: on the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. Open Criminol J. (2010) 3:10–16. 10.2174/1874917801003020010 - DOI
    1. Vrij A, Mann S, Leal S, Granhag PA. Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth tellers: an examination of their strategies. Open Criminol J. (2010) 3:17–22. 10.2174/18749178010030200017 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources