Agitation thrombolysis combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute portal vein thrombosis
- PMID: 30357003
- PMCID: PMC6196336
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i39.4482
Agitation thrombolysis combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute portal vein thrombosis
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of agitation thrombolysis (AT) combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT).
Methods: Nine patients with non-cirrhotic acute PVT who underwent AT combined with CDT were analyzed retrospectively. Portography was carried out via the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic (commonly known as TIP) or percutaneous transhepatic (commonly known as PT) route, followed by AT combined with CDT. Complications of the procedure, and the changes in clinical symptoms, hemodynamics of the portal vein and liver function were recorded. Follow-up was scheduled at 1, 3 and 6 mo after treatment, and every 6 mo thereafter, or when the patients developed clinical symptoms related to PVT. Color Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were performed during the follow-up period to determine the condition of the portal vein.
Results: AT combined with CDT was successfully performed. The portal vein was reached via the TIP route in 6 patients, and via the PT route in 3 patients. All clinical symptoms were relieved or disappeared, with the exception of 1 patient who died of intestinal necrosis 9 d after treatment. Significant differences in the changes in portal vein hemodynamics were observed, including the maximum lumen occupancy of PVT, portal vein pressure and flow velocity between pre- and post-treatment (P < 0.05). During the follow-up period, recurrence was observed in 1 patient at 19 mo after the procedure, and the portal vein was patent in the remaining patients.
Conclusion: AT combined with CDT is a safe and effective method for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute PVT.
Keywords: Agitation thrombolysis; Catheter-directed thrombolysis; Portal vein thrombosis.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict-of interest related to this article.
Figures
References
-
- Basit SA, Stone CD, Gish R. Portal vein thrombosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2015;19:199–221. - PubMed
-
- Loffredo L, Pastori D, Farcomeni A, Violi F. Effects of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:480–487.e1. - PubMed
-
- Liu K, Li WD, Du XL, Li CL, Li XQ. Comparison of Systemic Thrombolysis Versus Indirect Thrombolysis via the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Patients with Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;39:264–269. - PubMed
-
- Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA. The ATTRACTiveness of catheter-directed thrombolysis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6:303. - PubMed
-
- Ding PX, Li YD, Han XW, Wu G. Agitation thrombolysis for fresh iatrogenic IVC thrombosis in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:782–784. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
