Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;35(11):1763-1774.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician

Affiliations
Review

Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician

Lawrence Blonde et al. Adv Ther. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Real-world studies have become increasingly important in providing evidence of treatment effectiveness in clinical practice. While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the "gold standard" for evaluating the safety and efficacy of new therapeutic agents, necessarily strict inclusion and exclusion criteria mean that trial populations are often not representative of the patient populations encountered in clinical practice. Real-world studies may use information from electronic health and claims databases, which provide large datasets from diverse patient populations, and/or may be observational, collecting prospective or retrospective data over a long period of time. They can therefore provide information on the long-term safety, particularly pertaining to rare events, and effectiveness of drugs in large heterogeneous populations, as well as information on utilization patterns and health and economic outcomes. This review focuses on how evidence from real-world studies can be utilized to complement data from RCTs to gain a more complete picture of the advantages and disadvantages of medications as they are used in practice.Funding: Sanofi US, Inc.

Keywords: Clinical practice; Real-world data; Real-world study.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Luce BR, Drummond M, Jönsson B, et al. EBM, HTA, and CER: clearing the confusion. Milbank Q. 2010;88:256–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00598.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, et al. Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2293–2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnish MS, Turner S. The value of pragmatic and observational studies in health care and public health. Pragmat Obs Res. 2017;8:49–55. doi: 10.2147/POR.S137701. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fortin M, Dionne J, Pinho G, Gignac J, Almirall J, Lapointe L. Randomized controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities? Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(2):104–108. doi: 10.1370/afm.516. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. FDA. Developing a framework for regulatory use of real-world evidence; Public Workshop. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-07-31/pdf/2017-16021.pdf. Accessed 08 Sep 2017.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources