Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 24;100(2):436-452.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.001.

Neural Circuit Motifs in Valence Processing

Affiliations
Review

Neural Circuit Motifs in Valence Processing

Kay M Tye. Neuron. .

Abstract

How do our brains determine whether something is good or bad? How is this computational goal implemented in biological systems? Given the critical importance of valence processing for survival, the brain has evolved multiple strategies to solve this problem at different levels. The psychological concept of "emotional valence" is now beginning to find grounding in neuroscience. This review aims to bridge the gap between psychology and neuroscience on the topic of emotional valence processing. Here, I highlight a subset of studies that exemplify circuit motifs that repeatedly appear as implementational systems in valence processing. The motifs I identify as being important in valence processing include (1) Labeled Lines, (2) Divergent Paths, (3) Opposing Components, and (4) Neuromodulatory Gain. Importantly, the functionality of neural substrates in valence processing is dynamic, context-dependent, and changing across short and long timescales due to synaptic plasticity, competing mechanisms, and homeostatic need.

Keywords: BLA; Divergent Paths; Opposing Components; amygdala; circuits; emotion; lateral hypothalamus; motivation; neural; valence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Defining concepts with terminology.
Schematic differentiating related, but distinct, terms in emotion research. Green represents positive valence, while red represents negative valence. Valence refers to the “sign” of the state, with positive representing rewarding states and negative representing aversive ones. Value tracks the worth of external stimuli on a continuum analogous to integers that can be positive or negative. Intensity indicates the absolute value of the strength of an internal state.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Key theories of emotional processing.
In both theories valence is conceptualized distinctly from arousal level. In one framework it is a subsequent step, in another it is on a distinct axis.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Motifs in the neural circuit mechanisms of valence processing.
Four motifs are depicted on an implementational level. Motif 1, Labelled Lines represents a circuit with parallel sensorimotor paths for positive and negative stimuli that directly relay to downstream circuits driving approach and avoidance that do not interact or influence each other, which lends the algorithmic advantage of speed and robustness. Motif 2, Divergent Paths represents a circuit that receives the same sensory input but diverges to distinct downstream targets steered by synaptic weights and offers the advantages of associative plasticity, flexibility, and reversal. Motif 3, Opposing Components represents a circuit which, within an anatomically defined projection, contains neurons of diverse functionality that can serve to coordinate, regulate, and weigh different inputs. Motif 4, Neuromodulatory Gain represents a circuit wherein concentration-dependent activation of metabatropic receptors can extend plasticity time scales to allow for single-trial learning, state-dependency, and context-switching.

References

    1. Abercrombie ED, Keefe KA, DiFrischia DS, and Zigmond MJ (1989). Differential effect of stress on in vivo dopamine release in striatum, nucleus accumbens, and medial frontal cortex. J. Neurochem 52, 1655–1658. - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R, and Anderson DJ (2018). The Neuroscience of Emotion: A New Synthesis (Princeton University Press)
    1. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, and Damasio A (1995). Fear and the human amygdala. J. Neurosci 15, 5879–5891. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Hamann S, Young AW, Calder AJ, Phelps EA, Anderson A, Lee GP, and Damasio AR (1999). Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia 37, 1111–1117. - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R, Gosselin F, Buchanan TW, Tranel D, Schyns P, and Damasio AR (2005). A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature 433, 68–72. - PubMed

Publication types