Interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores as minimally importantly different for patients with malignant melanoma
- PMID: 30359910
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.005
Interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores as minimally importantly different for patients with malignant melanoma
Abstract
Introduction: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly recognised as an important end-point in cancer clinical trials. The concept of minimally important difference (MID) enables interpreting differences and changes in HRQOL scores in terms of clinical meaningfulness. We aimed to estimate MIDs for interpreting group-level change of European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores in patients with malignant melanoma.
Methods: Data were pooled from three published melanoma phase III trials. Anchors relying on clinician's ratings, e.g. performance status, were selected using correlation strength and clinical plausibility of associating the anchor/EORTC QLQ-C30 scale pair. HRQOL change was evaluated between time periods that were common to all trials: start of treatment to end of treatment and end of treatment to end of follow-up. Three change status groups were formed: deteriorated by one anchor category, improved by one anchor category and no change. Patients with greater anchor change were excluded. The mean change method and linear regression were used to estimate MIDs for change in HRQOL scores within the group and between the groups of patients, respectively.
Results: MIDs varied according to QLQ-C30 scale, direction (improvement versus deterioration), anchor and period. MIDs for within-group change ranged from 4 to 18 points (improvement) and -16 to -4 points (deterioration), and MIDs for between-group change ranged from 3 to 16 points and from -16 to -3 points. MIDs for most of QLQ-C30 scales ranged from 5 to 10 points in absolute values.
Conclusions: These results are useful for interpreting changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores over time and for performing more accurate sample size calculations in adjuvant melanoma settings.
Keywords: EORTC QLQ-C30; Health-related quality of life; Malignant melanoma; Minimally important difference.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Minimally Important Differences for Interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Jun 4;3(3):pkz037. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz037. eCollection 2019 Sep. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019. PMID: 32328553 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;159(2):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Gynecol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32972782
-
Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients.Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1327-1336. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab037. Neuro Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33598685 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the minimally important difference for the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02294-3. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 39304893 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Review of Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G Within Oncology.Value Health. 2024 Apr;27(4):458-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.12.012. Epub 2024 Jan 6. Value Health. 2024. PMID: 38191023 Review.
Cited by
-
Health-related quality of life following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a European multicenter study.Dis Esophagus. 2023 Mar 30;36(4):doac069. doi: 10.1093/dote/doac069. Dis Esophagus. 2023. PMID: 36241253 Free PMC article.
-
Results from a 1-day workshop on the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients: a joint initiative of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;50(11):1333-1341. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa119. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32783053 Free PMC article.
-
Immunotherapy Combined with Radiation in Malignant Melanoma without BRAF Mutations Brain Metastases-Favorable Response after Immunotherapy Continued beyond Progression.J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):86. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010086. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38248787 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Nivolumab for Melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: Results of PRESERV MEL.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;15(19):4823. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194823. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835517 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Important Differences for Interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Jun 4;3(3):pkz037. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz037. eCollection 2019 Sep. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019. PMID: 32328553 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical