Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study
- PMID: 30359983
- PMCID: PMC6425853
- DOI: 10.1159/000492960
Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study
Abstract
Background: With interest in personalised health care growing, so is interest in personal genetic testing. This is now offered direct-to-consumer, thereby referred to as direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT). Criticisms have been expressed on whether a truly informed decision to undergo testing is made with regard to these services. In order to provide relevant information to achieve this, knowing the characteristics of the expected user population is helpful. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify characteristics of individuals who (1) find the concept of DTC-GT acceptable and (2) consider undergoing DTC-GT in the distant or near future.
Methods: This cross-sectional study investigated factors associated with acceptability, consideration and intention in the Dutch general population. Studied variables included awareness, principles and how-to knowledge, attitude, innovativeness, and multiple demographic characteristics. Generalised linear models were applied to identify associated variables.
Results: Full data was obtained for 836 respondents. Of those, 18.3% found DTC-GT somewhat or totally acceptable, whereas 12.6% considered and 5.5% intended to undergo DTC-GT in the distant or near future. Acceptability was greater with lower principles knowledge, and consideration and intention with lower how-to knowledge. A more positive attitude and greater innovativeness were associated with an increase in all 3 outcomes.
Conclusion: Informed decision making may be hampered as individuals with lower how-to knowledge were found to be more interested in pursuing testing. The identified characteristics can be used in development and distribution of public and personalized information, in order to help consumers make a truly informed decision.
Keywords: Acceptability; Attitude; Consideration; Cross-sectional study; Direct-to-consumer genetic testing; General public; Innovativeness; Intention; Knowledge; Survey study.
© 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Changes in acceptability, consideration, intention, and uptake of direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands from 2017 to 2022.J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1919. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1919. Epub 2024 Jun 3. J Genet Couns. 2025. PMID: 38828901 Free PMC article.
-
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Public Health Genomics. 2017. PMID: 28068660
-
Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:774-783. eCollection 2019. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020. PMID: 32308873 Free PMC article.
-
[Direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands: impact on consumers and clinical practice].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2024 Aug 6;168:D8246. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2024. PMID: 39228349 Review. Dutch.
-
Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Per Med. 2017 Sep;14(5):433-445. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017-0029. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Per Med. 2017. PMID: 29754566 Review.
Cited by
-
May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach.BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 26;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01428-6. BMC Fam Pract. 2021. PMID: 33902442 Free PMC article.
-
European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review.Eur J Public Health. 2020 May 3;33(5):947-53. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz246. Online ahead of print. Eur J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32361734 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation considerations for offering personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study.BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09143-0. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32600382 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and Feasibility of Genetic Testing to Assess Risk of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Impairment Among Thai Adolescents and Young Adults.AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2023 Jun;39(6):294-301. doi: 10.1089/AID.2022.0060. Epub 2023 Mar 10. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2023. PMID: 36606684 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the general public's view of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing and their interpretation of DTC website disclaimer messages.Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug;31(8):939-944. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01411-y. Epub 2023 Jun 19. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 37337090 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Phillips AM. Reading the fine print when buying your genetic self online: direct-to-consumer genetic testing terms and conditions. New Genet Soc. 2017;36:273–295.
-
- Allyse MA, Robinson DH, Ferber MJ, Sharp RR. Direct-to-consumer testing 2.0: emerging models of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:113–120. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous