Sertraline in symptomatic chronic breathlessness: a double blind, randomised trial
- PMID: 30361250
- DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01270-2018
Sertraline in symptomatic chronic breathlessness: a double blind, randomised trial
Abstract
Does sertraline provide symptomatic relief for chronic breathlessness in people with advanced disease whose underlying cause(s) are optimally treated?223 participants with chronic breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale ≥2) who had optimal treatment of underlying cause(s) were randomised 1:1 to sertraline 25-100 mg (titrated upwards over 9 days) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion who had an improvement in intensity of current breathlessness >15% from baseline on a 100-mm visual analogue scale.The proportion of people responding to sertraline was similar to placebo for current breathlessness on days 26-28 (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.40) and for other measures of breathlessness. Quality of life in the sertraline arm had a higher likelihood of improving than in the placebo arm over the 4 weeks (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.01-0.41; p=0.044). No differences in performance status, anxiety and depression, or survival were observed. Adverse event rates were similar between arms.Sertraline does not appear to provide any benefit over placebo in the symptomatic relief of chronic breathlessness in this patient population.
Copyright ©ERS 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: D.C. Currow has received an unrestricted research grant from Mundipharma, is an unpaid member of an advisory board for Helsinn Pharmaceuticals and has consulted to Mayne Pharma and received intellectual property payments from them. He is a paid consultant to Specialist Therapeutics. Conflict of interest: M. Ekström has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Louw reports personal fees for statistic consultation from Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: J. Hill has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Fazekas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Clark has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.M. Davidson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. McDonald reports personal fees for speaking from GSK and Novartis, personal fees for advisory board work from Pfizer, and fees for speaking that were paid directly to the hospital from Menarini, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D. Sajkov has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. McCaffrey has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Doogue has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.P. Abernethy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Agar has nothing to disclose.
Comment in
-
Sertraline or placebo in chronic breathlessness? Lessons from placebo research.Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 17;53(1):1802225. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02225-2018. Print 2019 Jan. Eur Respir J. 2019. PMID: 30655451 No abstract available.
-
Sertraline or placebo in chronic breathlessness? Lessons from placebo research.Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 17;53(1):1802316. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02316-2018. Print 2019 Jan. Eur Respir J. 2019. PMID: 30655452 No abstract available.
-
Lessons from negative dyspnoea studies: arguments for the multidimensional evaluation of multidirectional therapeutic approaches.Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 17;53(1):1802471. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02471-2018. Print 2019 Jan. Eur Respir J. 2019. PMID: 30655454 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical