Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb 11;3(3):230-240.
doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12315. eCollection 2016 May-Jun.

Standardized Assessment of Hereditary Ataxia Patients in Clinical Studies

Affiliations
Review

Standardized Assessment of Hereditary Ataxia Patients in Clinical Studies

Brigitte K Paap et al. Mov Disord Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Hereditary ataxias are a heterogeneous group of degenerative diseases of the cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord. They may present with isolated ataxia or with additional symptoms going beyond cerebellar deficits. There are an increasing number of clinical studies with the goal to define the natural history of these disorders, develop biomarkers, and investigate therapeutic interventions. Especially, early and preclinical disease stages are currently of particular interest.

Methods and results: Evidence-based, we review standards for sampling and storage of biomaterials, clinical and neuropsychological assessment, as well as neurophysiology and neuroimaging and recommendations for standardized assessment of ataxia patients in multicenter studies.

Conclusions: DNA, RNA, serum, and, if possible, cerebrospinal fluid samples should be processed following established standards. Clinical assessment in ataxia studies must include use of a validated clinical ataxia scale. There are several validated clinical ataxia scales available. There are no instruments that were specifically designed for assessing neuropsychological and psychiatric symptoms in ataxia disorders. We provide a list of tests that may prove valuable. Quantitative performance tests have the potential to supplement clinical scales. They provide additional objective and quantitative information. Posturography and quantitative movement analysis-despite valid approaches-require standardization before implemented in multicenter studies. Standardization of neurophysiological tools, as required for multicenter interventional trials, is still lacking. Future multicenter neuroimaging studies in ataxias should implement quality assurance measures as defined by the ADNI or other consortia. MRI protocols should allow morphometric analyses.

Keywords: ataxia; biomaterial; clinical assessment; quantitative performance tests; rating scales.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lynch DR, Pandolfo M, Schulz JB, et al. Common data elements for clinical research in Friedreich's ataxia. Mov Disord 2013;28:190–195. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamlage B, Maldonado SG, Bethan B, et al. Quality markers addressing preanalytical variations of blood and plasma processing identified by broad and targeted metabolite profiling. Clin Chem 2014;60:399–412. - PubMed
    1. Teunissen CE, Tumani H, Bennett JL, et al. Consensus guidelines for CSF and blood biobanking for CNS biomarker studies. Mult Scler Int 2011;2011:246412. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker M. Biorepositories: building better biobanks. Nature 2012;486:141–146. - PubMed
    1. Vaught JB, Henderson MK. Biological sample collection, processing, storage and information management. IARC Sci Pub. 2011;163:23–42. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources