Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 17:12:210-213.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.012. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial

Affiliations

Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial

Carrie M Nielson et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

The effectiveness of annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach is highest when return rates are optimized, which is aided by patient reminders. In a pilot patient-randomized controlled trial in two western Washington clinics of the Sea Mar Community Health Centers, we compared the effectiveness of two phone-based approaches to mailed FIT outreach reminders. In fall 2016, patients ages 50-75, due for colorectal cancer screening, and with a visit in the previous year at either of two clinics, were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not return the FIT within 3 weeks (N = 427) were randomized to receive either: a) a series of up to 6 automated phone reminders; or b) the combination of automated and live phone reminders (up to 6 in total). The sole outcome was FIT return within 6 months after the FIT mailing. FIT completion rates were similar in the groups assigned to receive automated calls vs automated plus live calls (40% vs 39%; p = 0.89). The effectiveness of FIT reminder mode differed by language preference (p for interaction = 0.03): among Spanish-preferring patients (n = 106), FIT return rates were higher in the automated-only group than to the auto- plus live-call group (62% vs 39%, p = 0.02). Among English-preferring patients, no difference in modes was observed (n = 279, 32% vs 34%, p = 0.74). We observed no added benefit of live reminder calls in a mailed FIT plus automated call reminder program; our findings may inform efforts to efficiently optimize mailed-FIT outreach programs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01742065.

Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; Community health centers; Early detection of cancer; Language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Associations between reminder mode and FIT return, overall and by language preference* in Sea Mar Community Health Centers (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals). * For the interaction between language preference (Spanish or English) and reminder mode in the intention-to-treat analysis, p = 0.03. In the per-protocol analysis, p for interaction = 0.11.

References

    1. Albright K., Richardson T., Kempe K.L., Wallace K. Toward a trustworthy voice: increasing the effectiveness of automated outreach calls to promote colorectal cancer screening among African Americans. Perm. J. 2014;18:33–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker D.W., Brown T., Buchanan D.R. Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2014;174:1235–1241. - PubMed
    1. Brandzel S.D., Bowles E.J.A., Wieneke A. Cancer screening reminders: addressing the spectrum of patient preferences. Perm. J. 2017;21 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cha J.M., Lee J.I., Joo K.R., Shin H.P., Park J.J. Telephone reminder call in addition to mailing notification improved the acceptance rate of colonoscopy in patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011;56:3137–3142. - PubMed
    1. Community Preventive Services Task Force Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2012;43:92–96. - PubMed

Associated data