Use and outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after transvenous ICD extraction: An analysis of current clinical practice and a comparison with transvenous ICD reimplantation
- PMID: 30366163
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.026
Use and outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after transvenous ICD extraction: An analysis of current clinical practice and a comparison with transvenous ICD reimplantation
Abstract
Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) does not require the insertion of any leads into the cardiovascular system.
Objective: The aims of the study were to describe current practice and to measure outcomes associated with S-ICD or standard single-chamber transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) use after TV-ICD explantation.
Methods: We analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent transvenous extraction of an ICD and subsequent implantation of an S-ICD or a single-chamber TV-ICD at 12 Italian centers from 2011 to 2017.
Results: A total of 229 patients were extracted and subsequently reimplanted with an S-ICD (90; 39%) or a single-chamber TV-ICD (139; 61%). S-ICD implantation increased from 9% in 2011 to 85% in 2017 (P < .001). Patients reimplanted with an S-ICD were younger (53 ± 13 years vs 60 ± 18 years; P = .011) and more frequently had undergone extraction owing to infection (73% vs 52%; P < .001). The rates of complications at follow-up were comparable between groups (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.92; P = .940). No lead failures, systemic infections, or system-related deaths occurred in the S-ICD group. In the TV-ICD group, 1 lead fracture occurred and 2 systemic infections were reported, resulting in death in 1 case. In the S-ICD group, the rate of complications was lower when the generator was positioned in a sub- or intermuscular pocket (hazard ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.87; P = .048).
Conclusion: Our results show an increasing use of S-ICD over the years in patients undergoing TV-ICD explantation. An S-ICD is preferably adopted in young patients, mostly in the case of infection. The complication rate was comparable between groups and decreased when a sub- or intermuscular S-ICD generator position was adopted.
Keywords: ICD complications; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Lead extraction; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Sudden cardiac death.
Copyright © 2018 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1475-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Sep 27. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 29759827
-
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 8;68(19):2047-2055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.044. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27810043 Clinical Trial.
-
The need for a subsequent transvenous system in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Heart Rhythm. 2022 Dec;19(12):1958-1964. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Heart Rhythm. 2022. PMID: 35781042
-
Characteristics and early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing totally subcutaneous vs. transvenous single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.Europace. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):308-314. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux026. Europace. 2018. PMID: 28383717
-
Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator: An updated meta-analysis.Heart Rhythm. 2021 Mar;18(3):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 16. Heart Rhythm. 2021. PMID: 33212250
Cited by
-
Prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: guidelines and conventional prophylaxis.Europace. 2021 May 25;23(Suppl 4):iv11-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab071. Online ahead of print. Europace. 2021. PMID: 34037227 Free PMC article.
-
Wireless Device Therapy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using the Combination of a Leadless Pacemaker and a Subcutaneous Defibrillator: A Report with 2-year Follow-up of Two Patients.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Jun 15;15(6):5908-5910. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15064. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024. PMID: 38948666 Free PMC article.
-
Procedure, management, and outcome of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator extraction in clinical practice.Europace. 2023 Jun 2;25(6):euad158. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad158. Europace. 2023. PMID: 37350404 Free PMC article.
-
Measures to Prevent Infection in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacements or Upgrades.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 10;25(1):19. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501019. eCollection 2024 Jan. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39077641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Air entrapment as a potential cause of early subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator malfunction: a systematic review of the literature.Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(10):1608-1616. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac046. Europace. 2022. PMID: 35639806 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical