Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Oct 25:2018:bcr2018226318.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-226318.

Chest pain following permanent pacemaker insertion… a case of pneumopericardium due to atrial lead perforation

Suleman Aktaa  1 , Kavi Fatania  2 , Claire Gains  2 , Hazel White  1
Affiliations
Case Reports

Chest pain following permanent pacemaker insertion… a case of pneumopericardium due to atrial lead perforation

Suleman Aktaa et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is an increasingly common procedure with complication rate estimated between 3% and 6%. Cardiac perforation by pacemaker lead(s) is rare, but a previous study has shown that it is probably an underdiagnosed complication. We are presenting a case of a patient who presented 5 days after PPM insertion with new-onset pleuritic chest pain. She had a normal chest X-ray (CXR), and acceptable pacing checks. However, a CT scan of the chest showed pneumopericardium and pneumothorax secondary to atrial lead perforation. The pain only settled by replacing the atrial lead. A repeat chest CT scan a few months later showed complete resolution of the pneumopericardium and pneumothorax. We believe that cardiac perforation can be easily missed if associated with normal CXR and acceptable pacing parameters. Unexplained chest pain following PPM insertion might be the only clue for such complication, although it might not always be present.

Keywords: Cardiovascular Medicine; Pacing And Electrophysiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fluoroscopy image of the initial active fix right atrial lead.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chest CT scan showing pneumothorax and pneumopericardium (arrows).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chest CT-scan showing pneumothorax and right atrial lead perforation (arrows).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fluoroscopy image of the new passive fix right atrial lead.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The 11th annual report for the National Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices Audit, April 2015 – March 2016, published on 14th February, 2017. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/nicor/audits/cardiacrhythm/documents/annual-reports....
    1. Atwater BD, Daubert JP. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators: risks accompany the life-saving benefits. Heart 2012;98:764–72. 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301853 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dodson JA, Lampert R, Wang Y, et al. . Temporal trends in quality of care among recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2014;129:580–586. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003747 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russo AM, Daugherty SL, Masoudi FA, et al. . Gender and outcomes after primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). Am Heart J 2015;170:330–8. 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.02.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dai Y, Chen KP, Hua W, et al. . [Retrospective analysis on the clinical features and management of acute and subacute right ventricular perforation by pacemaker lead]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2013;41:862–5. - PubMed

Publication types