Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar;90(3):173-177.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0755-6.

[Rational diagnostics of acute appendicitis]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Rational diagnostics of acute appendicitis]

[Article in German]
M Hoffmann et al. Chirurg. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal emergencies. An accurate preoperative diagnosis is still a challenge in many cases. Patient history and clinical examination are the mainstay of diagnostics but other tools are also needed in order to reduce the number of misdiagnoses. Laboratory parameters and radiological imaging procedures are widely used and scoring systems can help in the risk stratification of patients with suspected appendicitis. In the USA most patients undergo preoperative computed tomography (CT) as the first-line examination, which can reduce the number of negative appendectomies to less than 5%; however, this practice results in substantial radiation exposure and is less accepted in Europe due to concerns about radiation-induced cancer in the often younger patients. Ultrasound is a valuable first-line imaging procedure and in experienced hands can achieve very good results. In patients with an equivocal diagnosis inpatient surveillance with close control of clinical and laboratory parameter represents a suitable method to reduce the number of negative explorations without resulting in an increase in the rate of perforation or morbidity.

Keywords: Active observation; Computed tomography; Negative appendectomy; Scoring system; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):28-37 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):86-92 - PubMed
    1. Int J Surg. 2005;3(1):49-52 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):886-92 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources