Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;12(1):149-162.
doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0340-6.

Validity of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) Questionnaire

Merel L Kimman  1 , Marlies S Wijsenbeek  2 , Sander M J van Kuijk  3 , Kioa L Wijnsma  4 , Nicole C A J van de Kar  4 , Marjolein Storm  5 , Xana van Jaarsveld  6 , Carmen D Dirksen  7 ; PESaM Collaborating Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Validity of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) Questionnaire

Merel L Kimman et al. Patient. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the validity and reliability of the generic module of the recently developed Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) questionnaire in a sample of patients in the Netherlands.

Methods: The generic module of the PESaM questionnaire consists of 18 items related to the domains effectiveness, side effects and ease of use of medications. It assesses patients' experiences regarding the impact of the medication on daily life, health and satisfaction. In 2017, the PESaM questionnaire was sent out to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients using pirfenidone or nintedanib, atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome patients receiving eculizumab and patients using tacrolimus after kidney transplantation. Mean scores for each domain were calculated applying a scoring algorithm. Construct validity and reliability were assessed using recommended methods.

Results: 188 participants completed the generic module, of whom 48% used pirfenidone, 36% nintedanib, 11% tacrolimus and 5% eculizumab. The generic module has good structural properties. Internal consistency values of the domains were satisfactory (i.e. Cronbach's coefficient alpha above 0.7). Confirmatory factor analysis provided further evidence for construct validity, with good convergent and discriminant validity. The PESaM questionnaire also showed different scores for patients using different medications, in line with expectations, and was therefore able to differentiate between patient groups. Test-retest reliability of the items and domains were rated as moderate to fair (i.e. intraclass coefficients ranged between 0.18 and 0.76).

Conclusions: The PESaM questionnaire is a unique patient-reported outcome measure evaluating patient experiences and satisfaction with medications. It has been developed in conjunction with patients, ensuring coverage of domains and issues relevant from the patient's perspective. This study has shown promising validity of the generic module of the PESaM questionnaire. Further research is recommended to assess reliability in greater detail as well as the responsiveness of the measure.

Trial registration: The study is registered in The Netherlands National Trial Register (Trial Code 5860).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Merel Kimman, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Sander van Kuijk, Kioa Wijnsma, Nicole van de Kar, Marjolein Storm, Xana van Jaarsveld, Carmen Dirksen, Paul Bresser, Ilona Coenen, Nynke Dijkstra, Brigitte van Dooren, Miranda Geelhoed, Marielle Gelens, Kirsten de Haas, René Jonkers, Bart Koopman, Henk Kramer, Mirjam van Manen, Jelle Miedema, Karen Moor, Rémy Mostard, Esther Nossent, Marieke Overbeek, Ellen Peeters, Rein van Rijswijk, Helen Ryan, Nelleke Tak, Anneke van Veen, Lucyl Verhoeven, Michiel de Vries, Monique Wapenaar, Ingrid Wegman and Jack Wetzels have no conflicts of interest, including non-financial, that are directly relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stacked bar chart of response distribution of the experience items in the generic module of the PESaM questionnaire (n = 188). Responses presented are the recoded scores so that high scores indicate positive experiences (e.g. a score of 4 represents ‘very positive influence’, ‘no negative influence’ and ‘very convenient’ for the domains effectiveness, side effects and ease of use, respectively)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of the confirmatory factor analysis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00087-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britten N, Pope C, Halford S, Richeldi L. What if we made stratified medicine work for patients? Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:8–10. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00499-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirji I, Gupta S, Goren A, Chirovsky DR, Moadel AB, Olavarria E, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): association of treatment satisfaction, negative medication experience and treatment restrictions with health outcomes, from the patient’s perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:167. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirsh AT, Atchison JW, Berger JJ, Waxenberg LB, Lafayette-Lucey A, Bulcourf BB, et al. Patient satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain: predictors and relationship to compliance. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(4):302–310. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000113057.92184.90. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources