Violations of Core Knowledge Shape Early Learning
- PMID: 30369059
- PMCID: PMC6360129
- DOI: 10.1111/tops.12389
Violations of Core Knowledge Shape Early Learning
Abstract
Research on cognitive development has revealed that even the youngest minds detect and respond to events that adults find surprising. These surprise responses suggest that infants have a basic set of "core" expectations about the world that are shared with adults and other species. However, little work has asked what purpose these surprise responses serve. Here we discuss recent evidence that violations of core knowledge offer special opportunities for learning. Infants and young children make predictions about the world on the basis of their core knowledge of objects, quantities, and social entities. We argue that when these predictions fail to match the observed data, infants and children experience an enhanced drive to seek and retain new information. This impact of surprise on learning is not equipotent. Instead, it is directed to entities that are relevant to the surprise itself; this drive propels children-even infants-to form and test new hypotheses about surprising aspects of the world. We briefly consider similarities and differences between these recent findings with infants and children, on the one hand, and findings on prediction errors in humans and non-human animals, on the other. These comparisons raise open questions that require continued inquiry, but suggest that considering phenomena across species, ages, kinds of surprise, and types of learning will ultimately help to clarify how surprise shapes thought.
Keywords: Children; Expectations; Infants; Learning; Object knowledge; Surprise.
Copyright © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Expectancy violations promote learning in young children.Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 28254617 Free PMC article.
-
How an infant's active response to structured experience supports perceptual-cognitive development.Prog Brain Res. 2020;254:167-186. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Prog Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 32859286 Review.
-
Should I learn from you? Seeing expectancy violations about action efficiency hinders social learning in infancy.Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105293. Epub 2022 Sep 30. Cognition. 2023. PMID: 36191356
-
Cognitive development. Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration.Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):91-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3799. Science. 2015. PMID: 25838378 Free PMC article.
-
Nonverbal generics: human infants interpret objects as symbols of object kinds.Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:689-710. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015232. Epub 2014 Sep 12. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25251493 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Achievement emotions in kindergarten: the association of solution accuracy with discrete joy, sadness, and surprise.Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 13;15:1466345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1466345. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 39872726 Free PMC article.
-
Core Moral Concepts and the Sense of Fairness in Human Infants.Hum Nat. 2025 Mar;36(1):121-142. doi: 10.1007/s12110-025-09490-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2. Hum Nat. 2025. PMID: 40172773 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seeing the Error in My "Bayes": A Quantified Degree of Belief Change Correlates with Children's Pupillary Surprise Responses Following Explicit Predictions.Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;25(2):211. doi: 10.3390/e25020211. Entropy (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36832578 Free PMC article.
-
Preverbal infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to gain access to contested resources.Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89821-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34035341 Free PMC article.
-
Predictions about reward outcomes in rhesus monkeys.Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb;138(1):43-58. doi: 10.1037/bne0000573. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Behav Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38060026 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abler B, Walter H, Erk S, Kammerer H, & Spitzer M (2006). Prediction error as a linear function of reward probability is coded in human nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage, 31, 790–795. - PubMed
-
- Adler JE (2008). Surprise. Educational Theory, 58, 149–173.
-
- Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, & Bisazza A (2008). Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Animal Cognition, 11, 495–503. - PubMed
-
- Baillargeon R (2004). Infants’ physical world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 89–94.
-
- Baillargeon R & Hanko-Summers S (1990). Is the top object adequately supported by the bottom object? Young infants’ understanding of support relations. Cognitive Development, 5, 29–53.