Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;6(18):360.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.33.

The clinical value of routinely obtained postoperative chest radiographs in post-anaesthesia care unit patients seems poor-a prospective observational study

Affiliations

The clinical value of routinely obtained postoperative chest radiographs in post-anaesthesia care unit patients seems poor-a prospective observational study

Anke Kröner et al. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The clinical value of routinely obtained postoperative chest radiographs (CXRs) in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) patients is largely unknown.

Methods: To determine the diagnostic efficacy and treatment impact of postoperative routinely obtained CXRs in a university hospital PACU. Observational study collecting the expectations of attending physicians, the findings on routinely obtained CXRs and actions based on the findings on these CXRs in postoperative PACU patients. A 22-bed PACU in a university hospital in the Netherlands. Patients admitted to the PACU during a 9-month period. The analysis was restricted to CXRs routinely obtained during the first PACU admission, i.e., CXRs obtained during later admissions were excluded. Diagnostic efficacy, defined as the percentage of CXRs showing any unexpected major abnormality; treatment impact, defined as the percentage of CXRs showing an unexpected major abnormality that triggered a predefined change in therapy.

Results: The analysis included 294 postoperative CXRs. Of them 94 showed a new and unexpected predefined major abnormality (diagnostic efficacy of 35%). Of these 94 CXRs, only 10 triggered an intervention (treatment impact of 4%).

Conclusions: The diagnostic efficacy of routinely obtained postoperative CXRs in PACU patients is fair; the treatment impact seems low if we assume that all CXRs that showed an abnormality but were not followed by an intervention and did not require an intervention. Future research should focus on the safety and cost-effectiveness of abrogating routine postoperative CXRs.

Keywords: CXR; Chest radiograph; post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU); post-operative; recovery; routine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the number of CXRs performed on the PACU patients and the number of CXRs analysed. CXR chest radio graph; PACU post anesthesia care unit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Silverstein DS, Livingston DH, Elcavage J, et al. The utility of routine daily chest radiography in the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma 1993;35:643-6. 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barak M, Markovits R, Guralnik L, et al. The utility of routine postoperative chest radiography in the postanesthesia care unit. J Clin Anesth 1997;9:351-4. 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00017-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lessnau KD. Is chest radiography necessary after uncomplicated insertion of a triple-lumen catheter in the right internal jugular vein, using the anterior approach? Chest 2005;127:220-3. 10.1378/chest.127.1.220 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wirsing M, Schummer C, Neumann R, et al. Is traditional reading of the bedside chest radiograph appropriate to detect intraartrial central venous catheter position? Chest 2008;134:527-33. 10.1378/chest.07-2687 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lucey B, Varghese JC, Haslam P, et al. Routine chest radiographs after central line insertion: mandatory postprocedural evaluation or unnecessary waste of resources? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999;22:381-4. 10.1007/s002709900411 - DOI - PubMed