Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Oct 2;7(19):e009728.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009728.

Pilot Study to Compare the Use of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide-Guided and Diastolic Blood Pressure-Guided Chest Compression Delivery in a Swine Model of Neonatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pilot Study to Compare the Use of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide-Guided and Diastolic Blood Pressure-Guided Chest Compression Delivery in a Swine Model of Neonatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest

Caitlin E O'Brien et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background The American Heart Association recommends use of physiologic feedback when available to optimize chest compression delivery. We compared hemodynamic parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in which either end-tidal carbon dioxide ( ETCO 2) or diastolic blood pressure ( DBP ) levels were used to guide chest compression delivery after asphyxial cardiac arrest. Methods and Results One- to 2-week-old swine underwent a 17-minute asphyxial-fibrillatory cardiac arrest followed by alternating 2-minute periods of ETCO 2-guided and DBP -guided chest compressions during 10 minutes of basic life support and 10 minutes of advanced life support. Ten animals underwent resuscitation. We found significant changes to ETCO 2 and DBP levels within 30 s of switching chest compression delivery methods. The overall mean ETCO 2 level was greater during ETCO 2-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (26.4±5.6 versus 22.5±5.2 mm Hg; P=0.003), whereas the overall mean DBP was greater during DBP -guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (13.9±2.3 versus 9.4±2.6 mm Hg; P=0.003). ETCO 2-guided chest compressions resulted in a faster compression rate (149±3 versus 120±5 compressions/min; P=0.0001) and a higher intracranial pressure (21.7±2.3 versus 16.0±1.1 mm Hg; P=0.002). DBP -guided chest compressions were associated with a higher myocardial perfusion pressure (6.0±2.8 versus 2.4±3.2; P=0.02) and cerebral perfusion pressure (9.0±3.0 versus 5.5±4.3; P=0.047). Conclusions Using the ETCO 2 or DBP level to optimize chest compression delivery results in physiologic changes that are method-specific and occur within 30 s. Additional studies are needed to develop protocols for the use of these potentially conflicting physiologic targets to improve outcomes of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Keywords: capnography; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; diastolic blood pressure; pediatrics; physiologic feedback.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental timeline in minutes. ALS indicates advanced life support; BLS, basic life support; ETCO 2, end‐tidal carbon dioxide; ETT, endotracheal tube; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; VF, ventricular fibrillation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hemodynamic variables during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hemodynamic variables were measured during basic life support (min 0–10) and advanced life support (min 10.5–20) as CPR was delivered with ETCO 2‐guided chest compression (blue circles) and DBP‐guided chest compression (red squares). Each data point represents the mean value at 30‐s intervals. Open circles along the x‐axis represent epinephrine administration at 10, 14, and 18 min of CPR. A, End‐tidal CO 2 (ETCO 2). B, Diastolic blood pressure (DBP). C, Compression rate (CR) in beats per minute (bpm). D, Mean arterial pressure (MAP). E, Mean central venous pressure (mCVP). F, Diastolic central venous pressure (dCVP). G, Systemic perfusion pressure (SPP). H, Myocardial perfusion pressure (MPP). I, Mean intracranial pressure (ICP). J, Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gupta P, Tang X, Gall CM, Lauer C, Rice TB, Wetzel RC. Epidemiology and outcomes of in‐hospital cardiac arrest in critically ill children across hospitals of varied center volume: a multi‐center analysis. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1473–1479. - PubMed
    1. Tibballs J, Kinney S. A prospective study of outcome of in‐patient paediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2006;71:310–318. - PubMed
    1. Girotra S, Spertus JA, Li Y, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Chan PS; American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines Resuscitation Investigators . Survival trends in pediatric in‐hospital cardiac arrests: an analysis from Get With the Guidelines‐Resuscitation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:42–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moler FW, Meert K, Donaldson AE, Nadkarni V, Brilli RJ, Dalton HJ, Clark RS, Shaffner DH, Schleien CL, Statler K, Tieves KS, Hackbarth R, Pretzlaff R, van der Jagt EW, Levy F, Hernan L, Silverstein FS, Dean JM; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network . In‐hospital versus out‐of‐hospital pediatric cardiac arrest: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2259–2267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meert KL, Donaldson A, Nadkarni V, Tieves KS, Schleien CL, Brilli RJ, Clark RS, Shaffner DH, Levy F, Statler K, Dalton HJ, van der Jagt EW, Hackbarth R, Pretzlaff R, Hernan L, Dean JM, Moler FW; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network . Multicenter cohort study of in‐hospital pediatric cardiac arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10:544–553. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types