Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019:12:221-239.
doi: 10.1109/RBME.2018.2874353. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis

Review

Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis

Adam Rao et al. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2019.

Abstract

Recent developments in sensor technology and computational analysis methods enable new strategies to measure and interpret lung acoustic signals that originate internally, such as breathing or vocal sounds, or are externally introduced, such as in chest percussion or airway insonification. A better understanding of these sounds has resulted in a new instrumentation that allows for highly accurate as well as portable options for measurement in the hospital, in the clinic, and even at home. This review outlines the instrumentation for acoustic stimulation and measurement of the lungs. We first review the fundamentals of acoustic lung signals and the pathophysiology of the diseases that these signals are used to detect. Then, we focus on different methods of measuring and creating signals that have been used in recent research for pulmonary disease diagnosis. These new methods, combined with signal processing and modeling techniques, lead to a reduction in noise and allow improved feature extraction and signal classification. We conclude by presenting the results of human subject studies taking advantage of both the instrumentation and signal processing tools to accurately diagnose common lung diseases. This paper emphasizes the active areas of research within modern lung acoustics and encourages the standardization of future work in this field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Summary of the different types of acoustic signals for pulmonary disease diagnosis. This includes both internal sounds, such as breath sounds, and external stimuli, such as percussion.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
(a) This soft tissue–bone boundary in which the ultrasound wave is highly reflected, and thus appears as a white (hyperechoic) line of the femur. (b) A-lines are static horizontal regularly-spaced hyperechoic lines that represent an aerated lung created by reverberation artifact. (c) B-lines are discrete, laser-like vertical projections arising from the pleural line and extending to the bottom of the screen without fading. (d) Shred (fractal) sign shows echo-poor areas of the pleura, represented as a non-smooth pleural line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laennec RTH and Forbes J, A Treatise on the Diseases of the Chest, and on Mediate Auscultation. Samuel S. and William Wood, 1838.
    1. Cohen A, “Signal processing methods for upper airway and pulmonary dysfunction diagnosis,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 72–75, 1990. - PubMed
    1. Kompis M, Pasterkamp H, and Wodicka GR, “Acoustic imaging of the human chest,” Chest, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 1309–1321, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Mor R, Kushnir I, Meyer J-J, Ekstein J, and Ben-Dov I, “Breath sound distribution images of patients with pneumonia and pleural effusion,” Respiratory care, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1753–1760, 2007. - PubMed
    1. Marshall A and Boussakta S, “Signal analysis of medical acoustic sounds with applications to chest medicine,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 344, no. 3–4, pp. 230–242, 2007.

Publication types