Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0206384.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206384. eCollection 2018.

Cough-aerosol cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the prediction of outcomes after exposure. A household contact study in Brazil

Affiliations

Cough-aerosol cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the prediction of outcomes after exposure. A household contact study in Brazil

Carlos Acuña-Villaorduña et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures of cough-generated aerosols from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) are a quantitative method to measure infectiousness and to predict secondary outcomes in exposed contacts. However, their reproducibility has not been established.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of colony-forming units (CFU) of M. tuberculosis in cough aerosols on secondary infection and disease in household contacts in Brazil.

Methods: Adult sputum smear+ and culture+ pulmonary TB cases underwent a standard evaluation and were categorized according to aerosol CFU. We evaluated household contacts for infection at baseline and at 8 weeks with TST and IGRA, and secondary disease.

Results: We enrolled 48 index TB cases; 40% had negative aerosols, 27% low aerosols (<10 CFU) and 33% high aerosols (≥10 CFU). Of their 230 contacts, the proportion with a TST ≥10 mm at 8 weeks was 59%, 65% and 75%, respectively (p = 0.34). Contacts of high aerosol cases had greater IGRA readouts (median 4.6 IU/mL, IQR 0.02-10) when compared to those with low (0.8, 0.2-10) or no aerosol (0.1, 0-3.7; p = 0.08). IGRA readouts in TST converters of high aerosol cases (median 20 IU/mL, IQR 10-24) were larger than those from aerosol-negative (0.13, 0.04-3; p = o.o2). 8/9 (89%) culture+ secondary TB cases occurred in contacts of aerosol+ cases.

Conclusion: Aerosol CFU predicts quantitatively IGRA readouts among household contacts of smear positive TB cases. Our results strengthen the argument of using cough aerosols to guide targeted preventive treatment strategies, a necessary component of current TB elimination projections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One of our co-authors, Dr. Jones-López, is a co-founder and shareholder of a small startup company created in 2013 to develop and commercialize a molecular assay for tuberculosis diagnosis. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. TST and IGRA results in 230 household contacts of TB patient according to the number of CFU of M. tuberculosis in cough-generated aerosols or AFB smear microscopy in the index TB case.
(A) Histograms represent the proportion of contacts with a TST ≥10mm at baseline (black) and those with TST conversion (grey). The solid line represents the median TST diameter (mm) for contacts with TST ≥10mm at baseline (circles) and maximum TST for those with TST conversion (triangles) for each exposure group. (B) Standard box plots of maximum IGRA readouts in contacts of smear + culture + TB cases. P = 0.08 for aerosol CFU, p = 0.26 for AFB sputum smear (C) Standard box plots of IGRA readouts in contacts with TST conversion. P = 0.02 for aerosol CFU, p = 0.33 for AFB sputum smear.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Proportion of household contacts with a positive (≥10mm) tTST and IGRA at study completion (8–12 weeks) by contact age group and CFU of M. tuberculosis in cough-generated aerosols in the index case: Negative (CFU = 0) or positive (CFU ≥1).
The “N” under each histogram indicates the number of contacts within each age-exposure category. The stars (*) represent the median TST or mean IGRA readout associated with each group.

References

    1. Roy CJ, Milton DK. Airborne transmission of communicable infection—the elusive pathway. N Engl J Med. 2004. April 22;350(17):1710–2. 10.1056/NEJMp048051 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yates TA, Khan PY, Knight GM, Taylor JG, McHugh TD, Lipman M. The transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in high burden settings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016. February;16(2):227–38. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00499-5 Epub 2016 Jan 26. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riley RL, Mills CC, O'Grady F, Sultan LU, Wittstadt F, Shipvuri DN. Infectiousness of air from a tuberculosis ward. Ultraviolet irradiation of infected air: comparative infectiousness of different patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1962. April;85:511–25. . - PubMed
    1. Escombe AR, Oeser C, Gilman RH, Navincopa M, Ticona E, Martínez C, et al. The detection of airborne transmission of tuberculosis from HIV-infected patients, using an in vivo air sampling model. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. May 15;44(10):1349–57. Epub 2007 Apr 9. 10.1086/515397 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fennelly KP, Jones-López EC. Quantity and Quality of Inhaled Dose Predicts Immunopathology in Tuberculosis. Front Immunol. 2015. June 29;6:313 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00313 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types