Genomic analysis of the Phalaenopsis pathogen Dickeya sp. PA1, representing the emerging species Dickeya fangzhongdai
- PMID: 30373513
- PMCID: PMC6206727
- DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5154-3
Genomic analysis of the Phalaenopsis pathogen Dickeya sp. PA1, representing the emerging species Dickeya fangzhongdai
Abstract
Background: Dickeya sp. strain PA1 is the causal agent of bacterial soft rot in Phalaenopsis, an important indoor orchid in China. PA1 and a few other strains were grouped into a novel species, Dickeya fangzhongdai, and only the orchid-associated strains have been shown to cause soft rot symptoms.
Methods: We constructed the complete PA1 genome sequence and used comparative genomics to explore the differences in genomic features between D. fangzhongdai and other Dickeya species.
Results: PA1 has a 4,979,223-bp circular genome with 4269 predicted protein-coding genes. D. fangzhongdai was phylogenetically similar to Dickeya solani and Dickeya dadantii. The type I to type VI secretion systems (T1SS-T6SS), except for the stt-type T2SS, were identified in D. fangzhongdai. The three phylogenetically similar species varied significantly in terms of their T5SSs and T6SSs, as did the different D. fangzhongdai strains. Genomic island (GI) prediction and synteny analysis (compared to D. fangzhongdai strains) of PA1 also indicated the presence of T5SSs and T6SSs in strain-specific regions. Two typical CRISPR arrays were identified in D. fangzhongdai and in most other Dickeya species, except for D. solani. CRISPR-1 was present in all of these Dickeya species, while the presence of CRISPR-2 varied due to species differentiation. A large polyketide/nonribosomal peptide (PK/NRP) cluster, similar to the zeamine biosynthetic gene cluster in Dickeya zeae rice strains, was discovered in D. fangzhongdai and D. solani. The D. fangzhongdai and D. solani strains might recently have acquired this gene cluster by horizontal gene transfer (HGT).
Conclusions: Orchid-associated strains are the typical members of D. fangzhongdai. Genomic analysis of PA1 suggested that this strain presents the genomic characteristics of this novel species. Considering the absence of the stt-type T2SS, the presence of CRISPR loci and the zeamine biosynthetic gene cluster, D. fangzhongdai is likely a transitional form between D. dadantii and D. solani. This is supported by the later acquisition of the zeamine cluster and the loss of CRISPR arrays by D. solani. Comparisons of phylogenetic positions and virulence determinants could be helpful for the effective quarantine and control of this emerging species.
Keywords: CRISPR; Comparative genomics; Dickeya; Novel species; PKs/NRPs; Secretion systems.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable. This research did not involve the human subjects, human material, or human data. We isolated the plant pathogen from diseased
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures








































Similar articles
-
Genomic divergence between Dickeya zeae strain EC2 isolated from rice and previously identified strains, suggests a different rice foot rot strain.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240908. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33079956 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic and metabolic comparison with Dickeya dadantii 3937 reveals the emerging Dickeya solani potato pathogen to display distinctive metabolic activities and T5SS/T6SS-related toxin repertoire.BMC Genomics. 2014 Apr 15;15:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-283. BMC Genomics. 2014. PMID: 24735398 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic characterisation of the new Dickeya fangzhongdai species regrouping plant pathogens and environmental isolates.BMC Genomics. 2019 Jan 11;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5332-3. BMC Genomics. 2019. PMID: 30634913 Free PMC article.
-
Dickeya Diversity and Pathogenic Mechanisms.Annu Rev Microbiol. 2024 Nov;78(1):621-642. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041222-012242. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39565948 Review.
-
The Bacterial Guide to Designing a Diversified Gene Portfolio.2020 May 1. In: Tettelin H, Medini D, editors. The Pangenome: Diversity, Dynamics and Evolution of Genomes [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. 2020 May 1. In: Tettelin H, Medini D, editors. The Pangenome: Diversity, Dynamics and Evolution of Genomes [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. PMID: 32633915 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Genomic Comparisons and Phenotypic Diversity of Dickeya zeae Strains Causing Bacterial Soft Rot of Banana in China.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 9;13:822829. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.822829. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35222482 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective survey of Dickeya fangzhongdai using a novel validated real-time PCR assay.Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 13;14:1249955. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249955. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38414710 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic divergence between Dickeya zeae strain EC2 isolated from rice and previously identified strains, suggests a different rice foot rot strain.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240908. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33079956 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic and Phenotypic Biology of Novel Strains of Dickeya zeae Isolated From Pineapple and Taro in Hawaii: Insights Into Genome Plasticity, Pathogenicity, and Virulence Determinants.Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 11;12:663851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.663851. eCollection 2021. Front Plant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34456933 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Pathogenomic Analysis of Two Banana Pathogenic Dickeya Strains Isolated from China and the Philippines.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 22;23(21):12758. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112758. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36361548 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Naushad S, Gupta R. Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the ‘Enterobacteriales’: proposal for Enterobacterales Ord. Nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. Nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. Nov., Yersiniaceae fam. Nov., Hafniaceae fam. Nov., Morganellaceae fam. Nov., and Budviciaceae fam. Nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:5575–5599. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001485. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Samson R, Legendre JB, Christen R, Achouak W, Gardan L. Transfer of Pectobecterium chrysanthemi (Burkholder et al., 1953) Brenner et al. 1973 and Brenneria paradisiaca to the genus Dickeya gen. Nov. as Dickeya chrysanthemi comb. nov. and Dickeya paradisiaca comb. nov. and delineation of four novel species, Dickeya dadantii sp. nov., Dickeya dianthicola sp. nov., Dickeya dieffenbachiae sp. nov. and Dickeya zeae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1415–1427. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02791-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dye DW, Bradbury JF, Goto M, Hayward AC, Lelliott RA, Schroth MN. International standards for naming pathovars of phytopathogenic bacteria and a list of pathovar names and pathotype strains. Rev of Plant Pathol. 1980;59:153–168.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous