Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 30;17(1):139.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0782-0.

Left ventricular subclinical myocardial dysfunction in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion: a contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Affiliations

Left ventricular subclinical myocardial dysfunction in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion: a contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Xi Liu et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: Early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is essential for recommending therapeutic interventions that can prevent or reverse heart failure, thereby improving the prognosis in such patients. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation and perfusion using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to investigate the association between LV subclinical myocardial dysfunction and coronary microvascular perfusion.

Methods: We recruited 71 T2DM patients and 30 healthy individuals as controls who underwent CMR examination. The T2DM patients were subdivided into two groups, namely the newly diagnosed DM group (n = 31, patients with diabetes for ≤ 5 years) and longer-term DM group (n = 40, patients with diabetes > 5 years). LV deformation parameters, including global peak strain (PS), peak systolic strain rate, and peak diastolic strain rate (PSDR), and myocardial perfusion parameters such as upslope, time to maximum signal intensity (TTM), and max signal intensity (Max SI, were measured and compared among the three groups. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between LV deformation and perfusion parameters.

Results: Pooled data from T2DM patients showed a decrease in global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial PDSR compared to healthy individuals, apart from lower upslope. In addition, increased TTM and reduced Max SI were found in the longer-term diabetics compared to the normal subjects (p < 0.017 for all). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that T2DM was independently associated with statistically significant CMR parameters, except for TTM (β = 0.137, p = 0.195). Further, longitudinal PDSR was significantly associated with upslope (r = - 0.346, p = 0.003) and TTM (r = 0.515, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our results imply that a contrast-enhanced 3.0T CMR can detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction and impaired myocardial microvascular perfusion in the early stages of T2DM, and that the myocardial dysfunction is associated with impaired coronary microvascular perfusion.

Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Myocardial perfusion; Subclinical myocardial dysfunction; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative first-pass myocardial perfusion MR images and signal intensity-time curves in normal controls (A, C) and patients with T2DM (B, D)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Differences in global radial (a), circumferential (b), and longitudinal PDSR (c) among patients with newly diagnosed DM, longer-term DM, and normal subjects. The dots indicate values outside the interquartile range, *p < 0.017
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differences in upslope (a), TTM (b), and Max SI (c) between patients with newly diagnosed DM, longer-term DM, and normal subjects. The dots indicate values outside the interquartile range, *p < 0.017
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relationship between longitudinal PSSR and TTM

References

    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet London, England. 2016;387:1513–1530. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1414–1431. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1414. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boudina S, Abel ED. Diabetic cardiomyopathy revisited. Circulation. 2007;115:3213–3223. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.679597. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aneja A, Tang WH, Bansilal S, Garcia MJ, Farkouh ME. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: insights into pathogenesis, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic options. Am J Med. 2008;121:748–757. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Bibra H, St John Sutton M. Diastolic dysfunction in diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: promising potential for diagnosis and prognosis. Diabetologia. 2010;53:1033–1045. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1682-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms