Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Dec;50(12):1620-1623.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0217-6.

Currently available bulk sequencing data do not necessarily support a model of neutral tumor evolution

Affiliations
Comment

Currently available bulk sequencing data do not necessarily support a model of neutral tumor evolution

Thomas O McDonald et al. Nat Genet. 2018 Dec.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest:

All authors wrote the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. A simple branching process model of tumor evolution.
(a.) Schematic representation for the accumulation of mutations in our model. (b.) Histogram of R2 values for the model with two mutational waves. Fitness values are as follows: type-0 : 0.9, type-i : 1+N(0.2, 0.012), type-ia : 1+N(μ,0.012) with μ=0.5 (blue), 0.6 (green), 0.7 (orange). Histograms are generated from 5000 draws from N(μ,σ). (c.) One example draw with R2 > 0.985 from each of the three cases in (b.) are shown with corresponding color codes. (d.) Fitness distribution of the clones corresponding to μ=0.6 (corresponding to green in (b.) and (c.)). (e.),(f.) Same as (c.),(d.) but with three waves of mutations. Fitness values in (f.) were chosen from a log-normal distribution with same parameters as (e.). The total size of the tumor in all cases is allowed to reach anywhere between 6×107 to 7×1011 cells.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. An infinite-allele branching process model of tumor evolution, including sampling as in in Williams et al.
We initiate each process with a single ancestor with birth rate of 1, a death rate of 0.1, and a double exponential fitness distribution with mean fitness change of 0.01 (weak), 0.04 (strong), and 1 (very strong) along with a neutral evolution model where there is no change in fitness and a model with only increasing fitness changes. (a.), The panel shows the time of a new subclone’s appearance with the birth rate colored by the subclone’s size at the end of the simulation, showing that the subclone size in a simulation with strong selection is associated with age, but also with its fitness. Allowing the simulation to run longer would result in younger subclones with high fitness outcompeting older ones. (b.) A plot of the cumulative number of mutations (M) and inverse allele frequency (1/f) shows linear trends in simulations where a single mutation arises from any mutation event and no additional noise is added to mimic the effect of sequencing. (c.) A linear trend is apparent between M and 1/f in the same model where each new mutation event contains Poisson(100) mutations and alleles are sampled to account for sequencing errors to create a result that follows the methods of Williams et al. (d.) Boxplots for 25 simulation in all models for 1,000 and 1,000,000 cells show there is little change in R2 as selection becomes larger, but allowing multiple mutations to occur at any mutation event has a large effect on linearity. (e.) The model is able to recapitulate nonlinear curves suggesting the models with selection do not necessarily result in linear curves, but can result in both types.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. The model from Williams et al. for multiple simulations.
Using the code provided by Williams et al. for situations with selection, we show that linearity between the cumulative mutation count and inverse allele frequency is widespread. We used the code with different seed values than provided by the authors to initiate the random number generator. (a.) seed = 5 (provided); (b.) seed = 7 (provided); (c.) seed = 2; (d.) seed = 911; (e.) seed = 1234. (f.) a histogram of the R2 for 5,000 runs of the code.

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Williams Marc J., et al. “Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types.” Nature genetics 48 (2016): 238–244. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sottoriva Andrea, et al. “A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth.” Nature genetics 47.3 (2015): 209–216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerlinger Marco, et al. “Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.” New England Journal of Medicine 366 (2012): 883–892. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding Li, et al. “Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing.” Nature 481 (2012):506–510. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welch John S., et al. “The origin and evolution of mutations in acute myeloid leukemia.” Cell 150 (2012): 264–278. - PMC - PubMed