The Role of Inhalation Delivery Devices in COPD: Perspectives of Patients and Health Care Providers
- PMID: 30374449
- PMCID: PMC6190525
- DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.2.2017.0168
The Role of Inhalation Delivery Devices in COPD: Perspectives of Patients and Health Care Providers
Abstract
Background: Inhaled medications form the foundation of pharmacologic treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Delivery Makes a Difference (DMaD) project was conducted to better understand health care provider (HCP) and patient perspectives about the role of inhalation delivery devices in COPD, and to examine the nature of educational efforts between HCPs and patients on proper device technique. Methods: Data were derived from 2 original quantitative, web-based, descriptive, cross-sectional surveys distributed to HCPs who manage COPD (n=513) and patients with COPD (n=499) in the United States. Descriptive statistics were used to assess data across important demographic variables. Inferential statistics were used to assess differences in attitudinal, descriptive, and behavioral measures that were cross-tabulated with demographic data. Results: When prescribing medication for newly diagnosed patients with stable or unstable COPD, only 37% of HCPs considered type of device to be highly important, with only 45% of HCPs assessing device technique in every newly diagnosed patient. Patients with COPD were also relatively unconcerned with proper device technique (64% never concerned), regardless of their COPD severity. Although patients did not identify education as a significant impediment to proper device use, they reported inconsistent educational experiences. Conclusions: We found that HCPs and patients prioritize medication over device when selecting treatments, showing limited concerns about proper device use. These results highlight the need to coordinate professional education with patient-directed educational efforts to further promote proper device selection and use in COPD management.
Keywords: copd; inhalation device; inhalation therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Sidney Braman has received honoraria for serving on advisory boards or has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Sunovion, and Genentech. Sandra G. Adams has been an investigator or received grants for research and continuing education from the National Institutes of Health, Veterans Affairs, The University of Texas System (Patient Safety Education Grant), the CHEST Foundation (GlaxoSmithKline Distinguished Scholar Award), AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sunovion. Ruth Adewuya is an employee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Arzu Ari has received honoraria for serving on advisory boards or as a consultant for Bayer and Aerogen. She has received research support from ARC Medical. JoAnn Brooks has served on an advisory board for Eli Lilly and has participated in speakers’ bureaus for Janssen and Sage. Nicola A. Hanania has received honoraria for serving on advisory boards or as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Teva. His institution has received research grant support from Sunovion, Mylan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cheisi, AstraZeneca, Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline. Donald A. Mahler has served on advisory boards or speakers’ bureaus for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sunovion, Theravance, and Grifols. He has received royalties from Hillcrest Media, CRC Press, and Mapi Research Institute. Jill A. Ohar has received honoraria for serving on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sunovion, and Mylan. Jay Peters has received research support from the Willard Foundation and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. Shahin Sanjar is an employee of Sunovion.
Similar articles
-
Results of a Patient Survey Regarding COPD Knowledge, Treatment Experiences, and Practices With Inhalation Devices.Respir Care. 2018 Jul;63(7):833-839. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05715. Epub 2018 Mar 20. Respir Care. 2018. PMID: 29559537
-
Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Mar 16;13:927-936. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154525. eCollection 2018. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018. PMID: 29588581 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with appropriate inhaler use in patients with COPD - lessons from the REAL survey.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 26;13:695-702. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S149404. eCollection 2018. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018. PMID: 29520137 Free PMC article.
-
Inhalation device options for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Postgrad Med. 2018 Jan;130(1):83-97. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2018.1399042. Epub 2017 Dec 5. Postgrad Med. 2018. PMID: 29210318 Review.
-
Impact of community pharmacists in COPD management: Inhalation technique and medication adherence.Respir Med. 2016 Sep;118:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 15. Respir Med. 2016. PMID: 27578467 Review.
Cited by
-
SPUR-27 - Psychometric Properties of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Medication Adherence in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Feb 19;17:457-472. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S394538. eCollection 2023. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023. PMID: 36844797 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Management of COPD in the Real World: Can Studies Reveal Errors in Management and Pathways to Improve Patient Care?Pragmat Obs Res. 2023 Aug 1;14:51-61. doi: 10.2147/POR.S396830. eCollection 2023. Pragmat Obs Res. 2023. PMID: 37547630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inhaler device feature preferences among patients with obstructive lung diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020718. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32569208 Free PMC article.
-
Inhalable microparticles as drug delivery systems to the lungs in a dry powder formulations.Regen Biomater. 2022 Dec 8;10:rbac099. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac099. eCollection 2023. Regen Biomater. 2022. PMID: 36683752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Experience of Using Electronic Inhaler Monitoring Devices for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Asthma: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 May 16;13:e57645. doi: 10.2196/57645. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025. PMID: 40378281 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Lung Disease (2017 Report). GOLD website. http://goldcopd.org/ Published 2017 Accessed December 2017.
-
- Dolovich MB,Ahrens RC,Hess DR,et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: Evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest. 2005;127(1):335-371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.1.335 - PubMed
-
- Broeders ME,Sanchis J,Levy ML,Crompton GK,Dekhuijzen PNR. The ADMIT series: Issues in inhalation therapy—2. Improving technique and clinical effectiveness. Prim Care Respir J. 2009;18(2):76-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2009.00025 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hodder R,Price D. Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat Soft Mist inhaler. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:381-390. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S3391 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Yawn B,Colice GL,Hodder R. Practical aspects of inhaler use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the primary care setting. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:495-502. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S32674 - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous