Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;23(4):808-817.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4014-4. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status

Tijmen Koëter  1 , Cynthia S Bonhof  2 , Dounya Schoormans  2 , Ingrid S Martijnse  1 , Barbara S Langenhoff  1 , David D E Zimmerman  1 , Floortje Mols  2   3 , Daria K Wasowicz  4
Affiliations

Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status

Tijmen Koëter et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: This study has aimed to evaluate the effects of surgery on physical activity (PA), quality of life (QoL), and disease-specific health status, by analyzing the differences between sphincter-preserving surgery (low anterior resection (LAR)) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) among rectal cancer survivors.

Methods: Individuals who were diagnosed with rectal cancer and who underwent an APR or a LAR between 2000 and 2009 were included. The different questionnaires on QoL, disease-specific health status, and physical activity began their surveys in 2010. Differences in QoL, health status, and physical activity were analyzed between the APR group and the LAR group.

Results: The study included 905 rectal cancer survivors (LAR, 632; APR, 273). Besides a higher rate of radiotherapy treatment in the APR group (94% vs. 75%, p < 0.001), there were no differences in clinical characteristics or in comorbid conditions between the LAR group and APR group. No significant differences were found in PA level between the patients who had undergone an APR vs. a LAR. Regarding QoL, APR patients did report a worse physical (p = 0.009) and role functioning (p = 0.03), as well as a worse body image (p = 0.001), compared to patients who had undergone a LAR. However, they reported fewer constipation (p = 0.02) and gastrointestinal problems (p = 0.009). Finally, compared to patients who had undergone a LAR with a permanent ostomy, APR patients reported a better body image (p = 0.048) and less stoma-related problems (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: This study showed no differences in PA level among the patients who had undergone an APR versus a LAR. With respect to their QoL, their physical and role functioning seemed to be worse in the APR patients. However, these differences in outcomes resolved when comparing the APR group with patients after a LAR with a permanent ostomy.

Keywords: Functional outcomes; Physical activity; Quality of life; Rectal cancer; Rectal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Cancer. 1999 Feb;35(2):238-47 - PubMed
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):156-63 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):203-13 - PubMed

Publication types