Similar articles

• Rate vs. rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation--an updated meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.

  Chen S, Dong Y, Fan J, Yin Y. Chen S, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 17;153(1):96-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Oct 2. Int J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21963208 No abstract available.
• The RACE study in perspective of randomized studies on management of persistent atrial fibrillation.

  Hagens VE, Van Gelder IC, Crijns HJ; RAte Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion Of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) Study Group. Hagens VE, et al. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Jun;7(2):118-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1027439430017. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003. PMID: 14618033 Review.
• [Modern trends in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation].

  Abuladze G, Mamamtavrishvili N, Jashi I, Kantaria D, Ambroladze N. Abuladze G, et al. Georgian Med News. 2005 Apr;(121):59-61. Georgian Med News. 2005. PMID: 15908727 Review. Russian.
• Clinical review: clinical management of atrial fibrillation - rate control versus rhythm control.

  Lim HS, Hamaad A, Lip GY. Lim HS, et al. Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):271-9. doi: 10.1186/cc2827. Epub 2004 Feb 19. Crit Care. 2004. PMID: 15312210 Free PMC article. Review.
• Determinants of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with early-persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

  de With RR, Rienstra M, Crijns HJGM, Van Gelder IC; RACE 3 investigators. de With RR, et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jun;109(6):787-789. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01581-0. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31784901 No abstract available.