Prognostic Accuracy of the HEART Score for Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Presenting With Chest Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 30375097
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.13649
Prognostic Accuracy of the HEART Score for Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Presenting With Chest Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The HEART score has been proposed for emergency department (ED) prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We sought to summarize all studies assessing the prognostic accuracy of the HEART score for prediction of MACE in adult ED patients presenting with chest pain.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception through May 2018 and included studies using the HEART score for the prediction of short-term MACE in adult patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. The main outcome was short-term (i.e., 30-day or 6-week) incidence of MACE. We secondarily evaluated the prognostic accuracy of the HEART score for prediction of mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). Where available, accuracy of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score was determined.
Results: We included 30 studies (n = 44,202) in analysis. A HEART score above the low-risk threshold (≥4) had a sensitivity of 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 93.3%-97.5%) and specificity of 44.6% (95% CI = 38.8%-50.5%) for MACE. A high-risk HEART score (≥7) had a sensitivity of 39.5% (95% CI = 31.6%-48.1%) and specificity of 95.0% (95% CI = 92.6%-96.6%) for MACE, whereas a TIMI score above the low-risk threshold (≥2) had a sensitivity of 87.8% (95% CI = 80.2%-92.8%) and specificity of 48.1% (95% CI = 38.9%-57.5%) for MACE. A high-risk TIMI score (≥6) was 2.8% sensitive (95% CI = 0.8%-9.6%), but 99.6% (95% CI = 98.5%-99.9%) specific for MACE. A HEART score ≥ 4 had a sensitivity of 95.0% (95% CI = 87.2%-98.2%) for prediction of mortality and 97.5% (95% CI = 93.7%-99.0%) for prediction of MI.
Conclusions: The HEART score has excellent performance for prediction of MACE (particularly mortality and MI) in chest pain patients and should be the primary clinical decision instrument used for the risk stratification of this patient population.
© 2018 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Comment in
-
ED Chest Pain Rules: Follow Your HEART?Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(2):261-262. doi: 10.1111/acem.13647. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Acad Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30375128 No abstract available.
-
Prognosis Versus Diagnosis and Test Accuracy versus Risk Estimation: Exploring the Clinical Application of the HEART Score.Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):701-703. doi: 10.1111/acem.13717. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Acad Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30801827 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):704-706. doi: 10.1111/acem.13716. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Acad Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30801829 No abstract available.
-
Review: In adults with chest pain, a HEART score ≥ 4 has 96% sensitivity and 45% specificity for predicting MACE.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 19;170(6):JC35. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ201903190-035. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30884505 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Early Exclusion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.006. J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28992867
-
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018. PMID: 29316995
-
HEART Score Risk Stratification of Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Ann Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30718010
-
Risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency department using HEART, GRACE and TIMI scores, with a single contemporary troponin result, to predict major adverse cardiac events.Emerg Med J. 2018 Jul;35(7):420-427. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207172. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Emerg Med J. 2018. PMID: 29622596
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):1039-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092119. Epub 2010 Jun 7. CMAJ. 2010. PMID: 20530163 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Qualitative Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support System to Guide Rhythm Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Survey Study.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 11;6(8):e36443. doi: 10.2196/36443. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35969422 Free PMC article.
-
Heart rate n-variability (HRnV) and its application to risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01455-8. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020. PMID: 32276602 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric Chest Pain: A Review of Diagnostic Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 1;14(5):526. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050526. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38473000 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early emergency department discharge for intermediate heart score patients presenting for chest pain.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Sep 9;4(5):e13037. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13037. eCollection 2023 Oct. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023. PMID: 37692195 Free PMC article.
-
A Prospective Evaluation of Clinical HEART Score Agreement, Accuracy, and Adherence in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients.Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;78(2):231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Ann Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34148661 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical