Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-2187.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675400. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Predicting Thromboembolic and Bleeding Event Risk in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Predicting Thromboembolic and Bleeding Event Risk in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review

Ethan D Borre et al. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke. Medical therapy for decreasing stroke risk involves anticoagulation, which may increase bleeding risk for certain patients. In determining the optimal therapy for stroke prevention for patients with AF, clinicians use tools with various clinical, imaging and patient characteristics to weigh stroke risk against therapy-associated bleeding risk.

Aim: This article reviews published literature and summarizes available risk stratification tools for stroke and bleeding prediction in patients with AF.

Methods: We searched for English-language studies in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published between 1 January 2000 and 14 February 2018. Two reviewers screened citations for studies that examined tools for predicting thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients with AF. Data regarding study design, patient characteristics, interventions, outcomes, quality, and applicability were extracted.

Results: Sixty-one studies were relevant to predicting thromboembolic risk and 38 to predicting bleeding risk. Data suggest that CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and the age, biomarkers, and clinical history (ABC) risk scores have the best evidence for predicting thromboembolic risk (moderate strength of evidence for limited prediction ability of each score) and that HAS-BLED has the best evidence for predicting bleeding risk (moderate strength of evidence).

Limitations: Studies were heterogeneous in methodology and populations of interest, setting, interventions and outcomes analysed.

Conclusion: CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and ABC scores have the best prediction for stroke events, and HAS-BLED provides the best prediction for bleeding risk. Future studies should define the role of imaging tools and biomarkers in enhancing the accuracy of risk prediction tools.

Primary funding source: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PROSPERO #CRD42017069999).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Literature Flow Diagram
Abbreviation: KQ=Key QuestionFigure 2A.
Figure 2A-F.
Figure 2A-F.. Summary Estimate of C-Statistics for Prediction Ability of Clinical Tools For Thromboembolic Risk
2A: CHADS2 continuous score 2B: CHADS2 categorical score 2C: CHA2DS2-VASc continuous score 2D: CHA2DS2-VASc categorical score 2E: Framingham categorical score 2F: ABC stroke categorical score
Figure 2A-F.
Figure 2A-F.. Summary Estimate of C-Statistics for Prediction Ability of Clinical Tools For Thromboembolic Risk
2A: CHADS2 continuous score 2B: CHADS2 categorical score 2C: CHA2DS2-VASc continuous score 2D: CHA2DS2-VASc categorical score 2E: Framingham categorical score 2F: ABC stroke categorical score
Figure 2A-F.
Figure 2A-F.. Summary Estimate of C-Statistics for Prediction Ability of Clinical Tools For Thromboembolic Risk
2A: CHADS2 continuous score 2B: CHADS2 categorical score 2C: CHA2DS2-VASc continuous score 2D: CHA2DS2-VASc categorical score 2E: Framingham categorical score 2F: ABC stroke categorical score
Figure 2A-F.
Figure 2A-F.. Summary Estimate of C-Statistics for Prediction Ability of Clinical Tools For Thromboembolic Risk
2A: CHADS2 continuous score 2B: CHADS2 categorical score 2C: CHA2DS2-VASc continuous score 2D: CHA2DS2-VASc categorical score 2E: Framingham categorical score 2F: ABC stroke categorical score
Figure 2A-F.
Figure 2A-F.. Summary Estimate of C-Statistics for Prediction Ability of Clinical Tools For Thromboembolic Risk
2A: CHADS2 continuous score 2B: CHADS2 categorical score 2C: CHA2DS2-VASc continuous score 2D: CHA2DS2-VASc categorical score 2E: Framingham categorical score 2F: ABC stroke categorical score
Figure 2A-F.
Figure 2A-F.. Summary Estimate of C-Statistics for Prediction Ability of Clinical Tools For Thromboembolic Risk
2A: CHADS2 continuous score 2B: CHADS2 categorical score 2C: CHA2DS2-VASc continuous score 2D: CHA2DS2-VASc categorical score 2E: Framingham categorical score 2F: ABC stroke categorical score

References

    1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131(4):e29–322. - PubMed
    1. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285(18):2370–2375. - PubMed
    1. Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Gardin JM, Smith VE, Rautaharju PM. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol 1994;74(3):236–241. - PubMed
    1. Lee WC, Lamas GA, Balu S, Spalding J, Wang Q, Pashos CL. Direct treatment cost of atrial fibrillation in the elderly American population: a Medicare perspective. J Med Econ 2008;11(2):281–298. - PubMed
    1. Thrall G, Lane D, Carroll D, Lip GY. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 2006;119(5):448 e441–419. - PubMed

Publication types