Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 30;18(12):141.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1111-4.

Genetics of Monogenic Diabetes: Present Clinical Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Genetics of Monogenic Diabetes: Present Clinical Challenges

Shivani Misra et al. Curr Diab Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Monogenic forms of diabetes have specific treatments that differ from the standard care provided for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, making the appropriate diagnosis essential. In this review, we discuss current clinical challenges that remain, including improving case-finding strategies, particularly those that have transethnic applicability, and understanding the interpretation of genetic variants as pathogenic, with clinically meaningful impacts.

Recent findings: Biomarker approaches to the stratification for genetic testing now appear to be most effective in identifying cases of monogenic diabetes, and use of genetic risk scores may also prove useful. However, applicability in all ethnic groups is lacking. Challenges remain in the classification of genes as diabetes-causing and the interpretation of genetic variants at the clinical interface. Since the discovery that genetic defects can cause neonatal or young-onset diabetes, multiple causal genes have been identified and there have been many advances in strategies to detect genetic forms of diabetes and their treatments. Approaches learnt from monogenic diabetes are now being translated to polygenic diabetes.

Keywords: Genetic testing; HNF1A; MODY; Monogenic diabetes; Neonatal diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Shivani Misra declares she has no conflict of interest.

Katharine R. Owen reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

    1. De Franco E, Flanagan SE, Houghton JAL, Allen HL, Mackay DJG, Temple IK, et al. The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study. Lancet Elsevier. 2015;386(9997):957–963. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60098-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shields BM, Shepherd M, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, Peters J, et al. Population-based assessment of a biomarker-based screening pathway to aid diagnosis of monogenic diabetes in young-onset patients. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(8):1017–1025. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0224. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johansson BB, Irgens HU, Molnes J, Sztromwasser P, Aukrust I, Juliusson PB, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals MODY in up to 6.5% of antibody-negative diabetes cases listed in the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry. Diabetologia. Germany. 2017;60(4):625–635. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4167-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Misra S, Hattersley AT. Chapter 18 monogenic causes of diabetes. In: Holt R, Cockram C, Flyvbjerg A, Godlstein B, editors. Textbook of diabetes, 5th edition. 5th ed. Wiley; 2017. p. 243.
    1. Diabetes genes: targeted next generation sequencing: analysis of 61 monogenic diabetes genes. Available at https://www.diabetesgenes.org/tests-for-diabetes-subtypes/targeted-next-.... Accessed September 26, 2018.