Penile length is preserved after implant surgery
- PMID: 30378249
- PMCID: PMC8519487
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.14604
Penile length is preserved after implant surgery
Abstract
Objective: To investigate if there is a correlation between penile size measured preoperatively and erect penis after penile implant surgery (PI). A common cause of patient dissatisfaction after PI is caused by patients complaining that surgery has shortened the penis. It has been suggested that stretched penile length preoperatively is almost the same after surgery when the prosthesis is in erect status. However, no comprehensive data supports this theory. This prospective study was done to investigate this theory.
Patients and methods: Standardised measurements of stretched penile length and girth were performed in theatre before PI implantation then re-measured at the end of the procedure with the penis in the erect position. We recorded type of PI, cylinder lengths and malleable rod diameters. All patients had data recorded on body mass index (BMI), hypertension (HTN), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ), and Peyronie's disease (PD).
Results: In all, 133 patients were assessed; 88 (66.2%) had a malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) and 45 (33.8%) an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). The median age and BMI were 56 years and 30 kg/m2 , respectively. In all, 40 (30.1%) patients had HTN, 37 (27.8%) had PD, and 89 (66.9%) were diabetic. The mean (SD) pre-implant stretched length was 12.8 (1.8) cm. The mean (SD) flaccid girth was 10.3 (1.2) cm. Postoperatively, the mean (SD) erect length and girth were 13.1 (1.7) cm and 11.3 (1.3) cm, respectively. Overall, there was a significant (P < 0.05) increase in both the mean (SD) length at +0.36 (0.63) cm, and girth at +1.04 (1.02) cm. Patients who had an IPP, had a greater increase in both length (mean [SD] 0.62 [0.72] cm) and girth (mean [SD] 1.7 [1.0] cm) compared to those who had a MPP (mean [SD] 0.22 [0.53] cm and 0.7 [0.87] cm, respectively) (P < 0.05). We investigated correlations between pre- and postoperative outcomes related to BMI, HTN, diabetes, and PD. None of these variables affected outcome.
Conclusions: PI surgery does not significantly decrease penile size compared to the preoperative assessment. The outcome was not affected by co-morbidities. The preoperative length and girth correlated well with the immediate postoperative erect penis, although girth was not necessarily comparable in this series of patients measured under anaesthesia. Recording penile dimensions in the clinic and agreeing these with patients' preoperatively may be a way of improving satisfaction levels with this surgery.
Keywords: #Andrology; penile implants; penile size; predictors; satisfaction.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None
Figures
Similar articles
-
Pharmacologically induced erect penile length and stretched penile length are both good predictors of post-inflatable prosthesis penile length.Int J Impot Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):128-31. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2013.50. Epub 2014 Jan 16. Int J Impot Res. 2014. PMID: 24430278 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Suprapubic Lipectomy and Penile Prosthesis Implantation.J Sex Med. 2018 Dec;15(12):1818-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.10.012. J Sex Med. 2018. PMID: 30527055
-
How Big is Too Big? The Girth of Bestselling Insertive Sex Toys to Guide Maximal Neophallus Dimensions.J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1455-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.012. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 29110808
-
Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men.BJU Int. 2015 Jun;115(6):978-86. doi: 10.1111/bju.13010. Epub 2015 Mar 2. BJU Int. 2015. PMID: 25487360
-
Revision of penile prosthesis surgery after use of penile traction therapy to increase erect penile length: case report and review of the literature.J Sex Med. 2011 Feb;8(2):607-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02121.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22. J Sex Med. 2011. PMID: 21091884 Review.
Cited by
-
Penile enhancement: A comprehensive and current perspective.Curr Urol. 2025 May;19(3):145-156. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000264. Epub 2024 Dec 17. Curr Urol. 2025. PMID: 40376478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Malleable Penile Implant Rod Diameter Predicts Complications and Patient Satisfaction.Sex Med. 2022 Apr;10(2):100486. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100486. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Sex Med. 2022. PMID: 35217441 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Outcomes in the Virgin Penile Implant Patient.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Feb 7;20(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0876-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30729323 Review.
-
Long-term experience with AMS-700 CXR inflatable penile prosthesis in high-risk patients with corporal fibrosis.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):66-71. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00962-y. Epub 2024 Aug 17. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 39154148
-
Penile length preservation in penile prosthesis placement: tips & tricks.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01123-5. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40604139 Review.
References
-
- Schultheiss D, Gabouev AI, Jonas U. Nikolaj A. Bogoraz (1874–1952): pioneer of phalloplasty and penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2005;2:139–146. - PubMed
-
- Welliver C, Kottwitz M, Ahmad AE, Wilson SK, Kohler TS. Manufacturers’ data show increasing implanted cylinder sizes and measured corporal lengths in inflatable penile implants. World J Urol. 2016;34:993–998. - PubMed
-
- Holloway FB, Farah RN. Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1997;157:1687–1691. - PubMed
-
- Deveci S, Martin D, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Penile Length Alterations Following Penile Prosthesis Surgery. European Urology. 2007;51:1128–1131. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous