Who uses self-exclusion to regulate problem gambling? A systematic literature review
- PMID: 30378459
- PMCID: PMC6376385
- DOI: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.96
Who uses self-exclusion to regulate problem gambling? A systematic literature review
Abstract
Background and aims: Self-exclusion programs offer an intervention for individuals with problem gambling behavior. However, these programs are insufficiently used. This review describes sociodemographic features and gambling behavior of self-excluders as well as goals and motives for initiating self-exclusion from terrestrial and online gambling. In addition, use of further professional help and barriers to self-exclusion are examined.
Methods: Based on systematic literature search and quality assessment, n = 16 original studies (13 quantitative, 2 qualitative, and 1 mixed method) published between 1997 and 2017 in English or German language were analyzed. Results are presented for online and terrestrial gambling separately.
Results: Online self-excluders were on average 10 years younger than terrestrial self-excluders. Self-exclusion was mainly motivated by financial problems, followed by feelings of losing control and problems with significant others. Financial problems and significant others were less important for online than for terrestrial gamblers. Main barriers for self-exclusion were complicated enrollment processes, lack of complete exclusion from all venues, little support from venue staff, and lack of adequate information on self-exclusion programs. Both self-excluders from terrestrial and online gambling had negative attitudes toward the need of professional addiction care.
Conclusion: To exploit the full potential of self-exclusion as a measure of gambler protection, its acceptance and its utilization need to be increased by target-group-specific information addressing financial issues and the role of significant others, simplifying the administrative processes, facilitating self-exclusion at an early stage of the gambling career, offering self-determined exclusion durations, and promoting additional use of professional addiction care.
Keywords: Internet gambling; problem gambling; regulations; self-exclusion; systematic reviews; terrestrial gambling.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Casino Self- and Forced Excluders' Gambling Behavior Before and After Exclusion.J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):597-615. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9732-0. J Gambl Stud. 2018. PMID: 29128959
-
A descriptive analysis of demographic and behavioral data from Internet gamblers and those who self-exclude from online gambling platforms.J Gambl Stud. 2015 Mar;31(1):105-32. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9418-1. J Gambl Stud. 2015. PMID: 24276575
-
Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling.J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):229-51. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0. J Gambl Stud. 2014. PMID: 23338831 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Description and assessment of trustability of motives for self-exclusion reported by online poker gamblers in a cohort using account-based gambling data.BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022541. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30580263 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Land-Based Self-Exclusion Programs: Demographics, Gambling Behavior, Gambling Problems, Mental Symptoms, and Mental Health.J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):367-394. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9777-8. J Gambl Stud. 2019. PMID: 29721719
Cited by
-
Online self-exclusion from multiple gambling venues: Stakeholder co-design of a usable and acceptable self-directed website.Internet Interv. 2021 Dec 18;27:100491. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100491. eCollection 2022 Mar. Internet Interv. 2021. PMID: 35004185 Free PMC article.
-
Who is Getting the Message? Sociodemographic Factors and Gambling Behavior Associated with Awareness of the Swedish National Self-Exclusion Registry Spelpaus.se.J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun;41(2):715-733. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10357-9. Epub 2024 Oct 7. J Gambl Stud. 2025. PMID: 39373779 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use.J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):259-276. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09859-8. J Gambl Stud. 2020. PMID: 31119509
-
Gambling Despite Nationwide Self-Exclusion-A Survey in Online Gamblers in Sweden.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 2;11:599967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599967. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 33343428 Free PMC article.
-
Mandatory verses voluntary self-tests for new online casino customers: effect on engagement, quality, gambling behavior and use of responsible gambling measures.Harm Reduct J. 2025 Feb 20;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01173-4. Harm Reduct J. 2025. PMID: 39979952 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: CRD, University of York; Retrieved from https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
-
- Cicchetti D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 - DOI
-
- Dowling N. A., Merkouris S. S., Greenwood C. J., Oldenhof E., Toumbourou J. W., Youssef G. J. (2017). Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 109–124. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.008 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical