Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2018 Nov;32(6):1823-1840.
doi: 10.1111/jvim.15337. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

ACVIM consensus statement: Support for rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants to dogs and cats

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

ACVIM consensus statement: Support for rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants to dogs and cats

Stanley L Marks et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

The gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal barrier is continuously exposed to noxious toxins, reactive oxygen species, microbes, and drugs, leading to the development of inflammatory, erosive, and ultimately ulcerative lesions. This report offers a consensus opinion on the rational administration of GI protectants to dogs and cats, with an emphasis on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs), misoprostol, and sucralfate. These medications decrease gastric acidity or promote mucosal protective mechanisms, transforming the management of dyspepsia, peptic ulceration, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. In contrast to guidelines that have been established in people for the optimal treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease, effective clinical dosages of antisecretory drugs have not been well established in the dog and cat to date. Similar to the situation in human medicine, practice of inappropriate prescription of acid suppressants is also commonplace in veterinary medicine. This report challenges the dogma and clinical practice of administering GI protectants for the routine management of gastritis, pancreatitis, hepatic disease, and renal disease in dogs and cats lacking additional risk factors for ulceration or concerns for GI bleeding. Judicious use of acid suppressants is warranted considering recent studies that have documented adverse effects of long-term supplementation of PPIs in people and animals.

Keywords: acid; canine; feline; gastroesophageal reflux; histamine type-2 receptor antagonist; misoprostol; proton pump inhibitor; sucralfate; ulcer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nehra AK, Alexander JA, Loftus CG, Nehra V. Proton pump inhibitors: review of emerging concerns. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;32:1823‐1840. - PubMed
    1. Othman F, Card TR, Crooks CJ. Proton pump inhibitor prescribing patterns in the UK: a primary care database study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:1079‐1087. - PubMed
    1. Rakesh TP. Proton pump inhibitors: use, misuse and concerns about long‐term therapy. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2011;4:53‐59. - PubMed
    1. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ. When is proton pump inhibitor use appropriate? BMC Med. 2017;15:36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gould E, Clements C, Reed A, et al. A prospective, placebo‐controlled pilot evaluation of the effect of omeprazole on serum calcium, magnesium, cobalamin, gastrin concentrations, and bone in cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2016;30:779‐786. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms