Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;38(1):67-73.
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001806.

Evaluation of the Repeatability and Reproducibility of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping for a 9-mm Zone Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Repeatability and Reproducibility of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping for a 9-mm Zone Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Jack X Ma et al. Cornea. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability and between-machine/operator reproducibility of optical coherence tomography (RTVue-XR) for mapping corneal epithelial thickness (ET) and corneal thickness (CT) over a 9-mm zone.

Methods: In 5 groups of eyes (normal, contact lens, dry eye, post-LASIK/PRK, and keratoconus), corneal ET and CT were evaluated in 25 areas in the following 4 regions: 1) 1 central zone within 0 to 2.0 mm diameter, 2) 8 paracentral zones from 2.0 to 5.0 mm diameter, 3) 8 midperipheral zones from 5.0 to 7.0 mm diameter, and 4) 8 peripheral zones from 7.0 to 9.0 mm diameter. Three devices with designated operators were used to obtain 3 scans per device for each eye. The repeatability, reproducibility, and coefficient of variation were calculated.

Results: For all areas up to 9 mm diameter, in normal eyes, contact lens eyes, dry eyes, post- LASIK/PRK eyes, and keratoconic eyes, repeatability and reproducibility ranged from 0.7 to 1.5, 1.0 to 2.6, 0.9 to 2.0, 0.7 to 2.5, and 1.1 to 2.3 μm for ET and 1.5 to 8.3, 2.3 to 12.1, 1.7 to 14.2, 1.4 to 13.7, and 6.9 to 18.9 μm for CT, respectively. The ranges of coefficient of variation values were 1.2% to 3.0%, 1.9% to 5.5%, 1.8% to 4.3%, 1.3% to 5.2%, and 2.2% to 4.5% for ET and 0.3% to 1.2%, 0.4% to 1.8%, 0.4% to 2.1%, 0.3% to 2.0%, and 1.2% to 3.0% for CT, respectively.

Conclusions: Optical coherence tomography produced excellent repeatability and reproducibility for corneal ET and CT measurements up to a 9-mm zone in normal eyes and eyes with different corneal conditions. The CT measurements in keratoconic eyes were more variable than those in eyes with other corneal conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources