Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jun;36(7):759-764.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675157. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

Trial Characteristics That Affect Parental Consent in Neonatal Drug Trials

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Trial Characteristics That Affect Parental Consent in Neonatal Drug Trials

I Blaire Hanvey et al. Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The main purpose of this article is to determine parental consent rates in neonatal drug trials and describe trial characteristics associated with higher rates.

Study design: We included neonatal drug trials published between 2009 and 2014 and compared parental consent rates among the following characteristics: phase type, gestational age, randomization type, drug administration route, drug dosing frequency, blood sampling, control type, length of study, funding source, and length of treatment. We compared characteristics using chi-square, Fisher's exact, one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: We identified 52 trials: 38 trials (73%) reported data of parental consent. Median percentage (interquartile range) of parental consent was 79% (62, 89). Higher rates were observed in studies that used active comparators (87%) and shorter study lengths (81% for studies <24 hours).

Conclusion: Parental consent rates for neonatal drug trials varied by study characteristics. Information on proportion of parents consented is valuable to assess generalizability of trial results and for preparing trial protocols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of systematic search presented as Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram.

References

    1. Betan EJ, Roberts EC, McCluskey-Fawcett K. Rates of participation for clinical child and pediatric psychology research: issues in methodology. J Clin Child Psychol 1995;24(02):227–235
    1. Hamvas A, Madden KK, Nogee LM, et al. Informed consent for genetic research. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158(06):551–555 - PubMed
    1. Hayman RM, Taylor BJ, Peart NS, Galland BC, Sayers RM. Participation in research: informed consent, motivation and influence. J Paediatr Child Health 2001;37(01):51–54 - PubMed
    1. Stenson BJ, Becher JC, McIntosh N. Neonatal research: the parental perspective. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89(04):F321–F323 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rothmier JD, Lasley MV, Shapiro GG. Factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical research. Pediatrics 2003;111 (5 Pt 1):1037–1041 - PubMed