How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points
- PMID: 30385443
- PMCID: PMC6252703
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023068
How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points
Abstract
Objective: If patient engagement is the new 'blockbuster drug' why are we not seeing spectacular effects? Studies have shown that activated patients have improved health outcomes, and patient engagement has become an integral component of value-based payment and delivery models, including accountable care organisations (ACO). Yet the extent to which clinicians and managers at ACOs understand and reliably execute patient engagement in clinical encounters remains unknown. We assessed the use and understanding of patient engagement approaches among frontline clinicians and managers at ACO-affiliated practices.
Design: Qualitative study; 103 in-depth, semi-structured interviews.
Participants: Sixty clinicians and eight managers were interviewed at two established ACOs.
Approach: We interviewed healthcare professionals about their awareness, attitudes, understanding and experiences of implementing three key approaches to patient engagement and activation: 1) goal-setting, 2) motivational interviewing and 3) shared decision making. Of the 60 clinicians, 33 were interviewed twice leading to 93 clinician interviews. Of the 8 managers, 2 were interviewed twice leading to 10 manager interviews. We used a thematic analysis approach to the data.
Key results: Interviewees recognised the term 'patient activation and engagement' and had favourable attitudes about the utility of the associated skills. However, in-depth probing revealed that although interviewees reported that they used these patient activation and engagement approaches, they have limited understanding of these approaches.
Conclusions: Without understanding the concept of patient activation and the associated approaches of shared decision making and motivational interviewing, effective implementation in routine care seems like a distant goal. Clinical teams in the ACO model would benefit from specificity defining key terms pertaining to the principles of patient activation and engagement. Measuring the degree of understanding with reward that are better-aligned for behaviour change will minimise the notion that these techniques are already being used and help fulfil the potential of patient-centred care.
Keywords: accountable care organizations; patient activation; patient engagement.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: GE has been a consultant to Emmi Solutions, which develops patient decision support tools; National Quality Forum on certification of decision support tools; Washington State Health Department on certification of decision support tools; PatientWisdom; SciMentum, Amsterdam and Access Community Health Network, Chicago. He has edited/published books that provide royalties on sales by the publishers: the books include SDM (Oxford University Press) and Groups (Radcliffe Press). He also initiated and leads the Option Grid patient decision aids collaborative, which produces and publishes patient knowledge tools in the form of comparison tables (http://optiongrid.org) and has part ownership of the registered trademark. He owns a copyright in CollaboRATE, IntegRATE and Observer OPTION measures of SDM and care integration. These measures are freely available for use. EF reports personal fees from Christiana Care Health System, personal fees from American College of Pathologists, personal fees from Angiodynamics (for profit company), personal fees from Blue Cross, Blue Shield of LA, personal fees from National Confederation of General Insurance, Private Pension and Life, Supplementary Health and Capitalization Companies, Brazil, personal fees from Blue Cross, Blue Shield of South Carolina, personal fees from Vizient, personal fees from Signature Healthcare Foundation, grants from Commonwealth Fund, grants from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, outside the submitted work; and he is a member of the Board of Directors of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Fannie E Rippel Foundation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Linking Practice Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies and Relational Coordination to Patient-Reported Outcomes in Accountable Care Organizations.Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):692-735. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12400. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Milbank Q. 2019. PMID: 31206824 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Patient Activation and Engagement Activities at Primary Care Clinics within Accountable Care Organizations [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Feb. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Feb. PMID: 39585947 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Accountable Care Organization Leader Perspectives on the Medicare Shared Savings Program: A Qualitative Study.JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240126. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0126. JAMA Health Forum. 2024. PMID: 38488778 Free PMC article.
-
Low-Value Care and Clinician Engagement in a Large Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO: a Survey of Frontline Clinicians.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):133-141. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05511-8. Epub 2019 Nov 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31705479 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical challenges for accountable care organizations: a structured review.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Oct;29(10):1392-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2833-x. Epub 2014 Mar 25. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24664441 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
An absence of equipoise: Examining surgeons' decision talk during encounters with women considering breast cancer surgery.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260704. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34914705 Free PMC article.
-
Agenda-setting in the clinical encounter: A systematic review protocol.PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312613. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39446854 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review.Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1162993. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162993. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37744479 Free PMC article.
-
Linking Practice Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies and Relational Coordination to Patient-Reported Outcomes in Accountable Care Organizations.Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):692-735. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12400. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Milbank Q. 2019. PMID: 31206824 Free PMC article.
-
Findings From a Commercial ACO Patient Experience Survey.J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 7;8:23743735211007833. doi: 10.1177/23743735211007833. eCollection 2021. J Patient Exp. 2021. PMID: 34179423 Free PMC article.