Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 25;8(3):321-327.
doi: 10.1159/000492783. eCollection 2018 Sep-Dec.

Number Needed to Diagnose, Predict, or Misdiagnose: Useful Metrics for Non-Canonical Signs of Cognitive Status?

A J Larner  1
Affiliations

Number Needed to Diagnose, Predict, or Misdiagnose: Useful Metrics for Non-Canonical Signs of Cognitive Status?

A J Larner. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. .

Abstract

Background/aims: "Number needed to" metrics may hold more intuitive appeal for clinicians than standard diagnostic accuracy measures. The aim of this study was to calculate "number needed to diagnose" (NND), "number needed to predict" (NNP), and "number needed to misdiagnose" (NNM) for neurological signs of possible value in assessing cognitive status.

Methods: Data sets from pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies examining easily observed and dichotomised neurological signs ("attended alone" sign, "attended with" sign, head turning sign, applause sign, la maladie du petit papier) were analysed to calculate the NND, NNP, and NNM.

Results: All measures of discrimination showed broad ranges. The range of NND and NNP suggested that these signs were, with a single exception, of value for correctly diagnosing or predicting cognitive status (presence or absence of cognitive impairment) when between 2 and 4 patients were examined. However, NNM showed similar values (range 1-5 patients) suggesting risk of misdiagnosis.

Conclusion: NND, NNP, and NNM may be useful, intuitive, metrics in assessing the utility of diagnostic tests in day-to-day clinical practice. A ratio of NNM to either NND or NNP, termed the likelihood to diagnose or misdiagnose, may clarify the utility or inutility of diagnostic tests.

Keywords: Dementia; Diagnosis; Mild cognitive impairment; Neurological signs; Number needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Larner AJ. A pragmatic approach. London: Springer; 2015. Diagnostic test accuracy studies in dementia.
    1. Quinn TJ, Takwoingi Y, Assessment of the utility of cognitive screening instruments . Cognitive screening instruments. In: Larner AJ, editor. A practical approach. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2017. pp. pp. 15–34.
    1. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950 Jan;3((1)):32–5. - PubMed
    1. Linn S, Grunau PD. New patient-oriented summary measure of net total gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2006 Oct;3((1)):11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ. 1995 Feb;310((6977)):452–4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources