Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):486-490.
doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_164_17.

Effect of Oral Care Program on Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Effect of Oral Care Program on Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vajihe Atashi et al. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common nosocomial infections that increase mortality rate and the length of hospitalization. Oral care can improve patient's oral health, however, the role of oral care in the reduction in incidence rate of VAP is indisputable. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of oral care on the frequency of VAP of patients in intensive care unit.

Materials and methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 80 participants who were randomly assigned to a control group and an intervention group from 2016 to 2017. Data were collected at the first, third, and fifth days of the study using a demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire and the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score for detecting pneumonia. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS software.

Results: The results of this study showed that the frequency of pneumonia on the third and fifth days was 15.80% (6) and 23.70% (9) in the control group and 10.50% (4) and 7.90% (3) in the intervention group, respectively. Chi-square test did not show a significant difference (p = 0.059); however, the frequency of pneumonia in the intervention group reduced compared with the control group.

Conclusions: According to the results of this study, the oral care program could not significantly decrease the incidence of VAP in critically ill patients compared with routine oral care practices. Similar studies with a larger sample size and longer duration should be conducted for better results.

Keywords: Intensive care unit; oral hygiene; ventilator-associated pneumonia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram

References

    1. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Ansari A. Comparing nurses opinion and practice about mouth care for patients under mechanical ventilation. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2012;13:19.
    1. Haghighi A, Shafipour V, Bagheri-Nesami M, Baradari AG, Charati JY. The impact of oral care on oral health status and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Aust Crit Care. 2017;30:69–73. - PubMed
    1. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Ansari A, Azizi-Fini I. Intensive care nurses' opinions and practice for oral care of mechanically ventilated patients. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013;17:23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi Z, Xie H, Wang P, Zhang Q, Wu Y, Chen E, et al. Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:8. - PubMed
    1. Hutchins K, Karras G, Erwin J, Sullivan KL. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and oral care: A successful quality improvement project. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:590–7. - PubMed