Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;1(1):99-106.
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy017. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

Design and implementation of pragmatic clinical trials using the electronic medical record and an adaptive design

Kelly Claire Simon  1 , Samuel Tideman  2 , Laura Hillman  3 , Rebekah Lai  3 , Raman Jathar  3 , Yuan Ji  4 , Stuart Bergman-Bock  1 , James Castle  1 , Tiffani Franada  1 , Thomas Freedom  1 , Revital Marcus  1 , Angela Mark  1 , Steven Meyers  1 , Susan Rubin  1 , Irene Semenov  1 , Chad Yucus  1 , Anna Pham  1 , Lisette Garduno  1 , Monika Szela  1 , Roberta Frigerio  1 , Demetrius M Maraganore  1
Affiliations

Design and implementation of pragmatic clinical trials using the electronic medical record and an adaptive design

Kelly Claire Simon et al. JAMIA Open. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility of pragmatic clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of treatments using the electronic medical record (EMR) and an adaptive assignment design.

Methods: We have designed and are implementing pragmatic trials at the point-of-care using custom-designed structured clinical documentation support and clinical decision support tools within our physician's typical EMR workflow. We are applying a subgroup based adaptive design (SUBA) that enriches treatment assignments based on baseline characteristics and prior outcomes. SUBA uses information from a randomization phase (phase 1, equal randomization, 120 patients), to adaptively assign treatments to the remaining participants (at least 300 additional patients total) based on a Bayesian hierarchical model. Enrollment in phase 1 is underway in our neurology clinical practices for 2 separate trials using this method, for migraine and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Results: We are successfully collecting structured data, in the context of the providers' clinical workflow, necessary to conduct our trials. We are currently enrolling patients in 2 point-of-care trials of non-inferior treatments. As of March 1, 2018, we have enrolled 36% of eligible patients into our migraine study and 63% of eligible patients into our MCI study. Enrollment is ongoing and validation of outcomes has begun.

Discussion: This proof of concept article demonstrates the feasibility of conducting pragmatic trials using the EMR and an adaptive design.

Conclusion: The demonstration of successful pragmatic clinical trials based on a customized EMR and adaptive design is an important next step in achieving personalized medicine and provides a framework for future studies of comparative effectiveness.

Keywords: clinical decision support; electronic medical records; pragmatic clinical trials; precision medicine; sub-group based adaptive designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of Best Practice Advisory (BPA) that opens for migraine patient when physician accepts progress note.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example of data workflow implemented in subgroup based adaptive design (SUBA) trial using migraine information.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A flow diagram of enrollment for (A) migraine subgroup based adaptive design (SUBA) trial and (B) MCI SUBA trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Westrich KD, Wilhelm JA, Schur CL.. Comparative effectiveness research in the U.S.A.: When will there be an impact on healthcare decision-making? J Comp Eff Res 2016; 5 (2): 207–16. - PubMed
    1. Chalkidou K, Tunis S, Whicher D, et al. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials 2012; 9 (4): 436–46. - PubMed
    1. Patsopoulos NA. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011; 13 (2): 217–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM.. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003; 290 (12): 1624–32. - PubMed
    1. Vickers AJ, Scardino PT.. The clinically-integrated randomized trial: Proposed novel method for conducting large trials at low cost. Trials 2009; 10 (1): 14.. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources